A Comprehensive Analysis of Redis and Memcached: In-Memory Data Store Comparison

1. Executive Summary

This report provides an in-depth comparative analysis of Redis and Memcached, two prominent in-memory data store solutions. Redis is recognized as a versatile, in-memory data structure server, offering a rich array of data types, persistence mechanisms, and advanced functionalities that allow it to serve as a database, cache, and message broker.1 In contrast, Memcached is a high-performance, distributed memory object caching system, emphasizing simplicity and speed primarily for caching ephemeral data.3

The fundamental differences between the two systems are evident in their feature sets and architectural philosophies. Redis provides extensive support for complex data structures (such as lists, sets, hashes, streams, geospatial indexes, JSON, and vectors), offers data persistence options (RDB snapshots and AOF logging), includes built-in clustering for scalability, and supports server-side scripting with Lua.1 Memcached, conversely, is distinguished by its multi-threaded architecture optimized for straightforward key-value caching, focusing on simplicity and high throughput for basic operations.3 A critical non-technical differentiator has emerged in their licensing: Memcached maintains its permissive BSD license 7, while Redis recently transitioned its open-source offering to a tri-license model including RSALv2, SSPLv1, and the OSI-approved AGPLv3, following a period of more restrictive source-available licensing.8 This licensing evolution for Redis has significant implications for adoption and community perception.

Generally, Redis is the preferred solution for applications demanding complex data manipulations, diverse data types, data persistence, or advanced operational capabilities such as publish/subscribe messaging or atomic server-side operations.5 Memcached excels in scenarios where the primary requirement is extremely high-throughput, low-latency caching of simple, ephemeral data, and where its multi-threaded architecture can be fully leveraged.5

The choice between Redis and Memcached is increasingly influenced by factors beyond pure technical capabilities. The recent licensing changes initiated by Redis Ltd. 8 and the subsequent emergence of the Valkey fork 9—an open-source, BSD-licensed alternative based on Redis 7.2.4 and backed by major cloud providers—underscore that vendor strategy, community trust, and open-source governance models are becoming pivotal considerations. Redis Ltd.’s initial shift from the BSD license to RSALv2/SSPLv1 was intended to address the use of Redis by cloud providers without commensurate contributions back to the project.10 This move, however, led to community discontent and the formation of Valkey.9 Redis Ltd.’s subsequent adoption of the AGPLv3 license for Redis 8, alongside the existing source-available licenses, represents an effort to reconcile with the open-source community.6 These developments highlight that the stability and openness of a project’s license can directly influence its adoption trajectory and the competitive dynamics within the ecosystem.

Furthermore, while both systems operate “in-memory,” Redis has evolved significantly into a “data structure server” with robust persistence options, blurring the distinction between a cache and a primary database for certain applications.1 Memcached has intentionally maintained its focus on volatile, high-speed caching.3 This divergence means Redis can address a broader spectrum of data management problems, albeit with potentially increased complexity, whereas Memcached remains highly optimized for its core competency.

In summary:

• Choose Redis when: Applications require complex data structures (e.g., lists, sets, sorted sets, hashes, geospatial data, JSON, vector embeddings), data persistence, atomic operations on data, publish/subscribe messaging capabilities, or a generally more feature-rich data management environment.1
• Choose Memcached when: The primary objective is simple, extremely fast, distributed object caching; data is ephemeral and can be regenerated from a source of truth; multi-threaded performance on large datasets is a critical requirement; and a simpler, less complex caching solution is preferred.3

2. Introduction to In-Memory Data Stores

In-memory data stores represent a critical component in modern application architectures, designed to deliver high performance by storing data primarily in Random Access Memory (RAM). This approach offers significantly faster data read and write operations compared to traditional disk-based database systems, where data access is constrained by the mechanical latencies of hard disk drives (HDDs) or even the faster, but still comparatively slower, solid-state drives (SSDs).1 The core benefits of utilizing in-memory data stores include substantially reduced latency for data retrieval, higher throughput enabling more operations per second, and a decreased load on primary backend databases. These characteristics are crucial for performance-sensitive applications, such as real-time analytics, high-traffic web services, and interactive gaming platforms, where responsiveness directly impacts user experience and system efficiency.3

Redis and Memcached stand out as two of the leading, mature, and widely adopted open-source solutions in the in-memory data store landscape.4 Memcached was originally developed by Brad Fitzpatrick for LiveJournal in 2003, specifically to address the scaling challenges of a rapidly growing dynamic website by providing a distributed caching layer.7 Redis, created by Salvatore Sanfilippo in 2009, emerged from a startup’s requirement for a more advanced in-memory solution that could handle complex data structures and offer more than simple key-value caching.13

The distinct origins and initial design goals of Memcached (focused on web scaling through caching) and Redis (aimed at richer data handling and versatility) have profoundly shaped their subsequent evolutionary paths and the divergence in their feature sets. Memcached’s genesis for alleviating database load on LiveJournal 7 led to its emphasis on speed, simplicity, and a distributed, multi-threaded architecture tailored for caching. Conversely, Salvatore Sanfilippo’s need for more sophisticated in-memory data manipulation when creating Redis 13 resulted in its early and ongoing support for diverse data structures, persistence, and a broader range of functionalities. This fundamental difference in purpose—Memcached as a dedicated cache and Redis as a more versatile data platform—explains why Memcached has largely retained a lean feature set focused on string-based caching, while Redis has continuously expanded its capabilities to include complex data types, persistence mechanisms, publish/subscribe messaging, and server-side scripting.

The very nature of “in-memory” storage implies an inherent trade-off: exceptional speed is gained at the cost of potential data volatility and higher per-gigabyte storage costs compared to disk. Data stored in RAM is typically lost if a server loses power or restarts, unless specific persistence mechanisms are employed. This trade-off necessitates careful consideration of features such as data persistence (or the lack thereof) and efficient memory management, which become critical points of comparison. Redis addresses the volatility concern by offering multiple persistence options, including RDB snapshots and AOF (Append Only File) logs, allowing data to be saved to disk and recovered.1 Memcached, by design, embraces volatility to maximize speed and minimize overhead, functioning as a purely ephemeral cache.3 Both systems employ sophisticated memory management techniques—Memcached uses a slab allocator to mitigate fragmentation 3, while Redis uses an encapsulated version of malloc/free along with various eviction policies 4—to optimize the utilization of this premium RAM resource. These differing approaches to durability and memory optimization cater to different risk tolerances and a wide array of application use cases.

3. Redis: Deep Dive

Redis (Remote Dictionary Server) has evolved from a simple key-value store into a powerful and versatile in-memory data structure server, widely used for caching, as a primary database, for message brokering, and in real-time analytics.

3.1. Company History and Evolution

Redis was created by Salvatore Sanfilippo in 2009.13 The commercial entity behind Redis, Redis Ltd. (formerly known as Garantia Data and later Redis Labs), was founded in 2011 by Ofer Bengal and Yiftach Shoolman.8 A pivotal moment occurred on July 15, 2015, when Salvatore Sanfilippo joined Redis Labs, and the company became the official sponsor of the open-source Redis project.8 Sanfilippo later stepped down as the lead maintainer of open-source Redis at the end of June 2020, entrusting the project’s stewardship to Redis Labs.8 In August 2021, Redis Labs rebranded to Redis Ltd., having acquired the intellectual property and trademark rights to “Redis” from Sanfilippo in 2018.8

Throughout its history, Redis Ltd. has made strategic acquisitions, including MyRedis, a hosted Redis provider, in October 2013, and RDBTools, a GUI for Redis management, in April 2019, which was later launched as RedisInsight.8 The company launched Redis Enterprise Cloud (initially as a beta in 2012, generally available in February 2013) and Redis Enterprise Pack (in early 2015) to offer enterprise-grade Redis solutions.8 It has also formed key partnerships with major technology players, including Pivotal (June 2017), Red Hat (October 2018), Google Cloud (April 2019), and Microsoft Azure (May 2020).8

A significant aspect of Redis’s recent history revolves around its licensing. Open-source Redis was originally distributed under a permissive 3-clause BSD license.9 Over time, Redis Labs (now Redis Ltd.) changed the licenses for its modules—add-ons that extended Redis’s functionality, such as RediSearch and RedisJSON—from AGPL to Apache2 modified with Commons Clause, and then to the Redis Source Available License (RSAL).8

A major shift occurred on March 20, 2024, when Redis Ltd. announced that new versions of open-source Redis (beyond version 7.2.4) would no longer be released under the BSD license. Instead, they would be dual-licensed under the Redis Source Available License v2 (RSALv2) and the Server Side Public License v1 (SSPLv1).8 Neither of these licenses is recognized as open source by the Open Source Initiative (OSI). This move was highly controversial and was stated by Redis Ltd. as a measure to prevent cloud service providers from offering commercial Redis-as-a-service products without contributing back to the Redis project.10

This licensing change triggered significant backlash from the open-source community and led to the creation of Valkey, a community-driven fork of Redis 7.2.4. Valkey is managed by the Linux Foundation, retains the original BSD license, and is backed by prominent former Redis contributors and major cloud providers such as AWS, Google Cloud, Oracle, and Ericsson.9

In response to the community reaction and the emergence of Valkey, with the general availability release of Redis 8, Redis Ltd. introduced a tri-license model for Redis Open Source. This model allows users to choose between RSALv2, SSPLv1, or the GNU Affero General Public License v3 (AGPLv3).6 The AGPLv3 is an OSI-approved open-source license, albeit with strong copyleft provisions. Concurrently, many features previously part of the source-available Redis Stack (like JSON, Search, Time Series, and Bloom filters) were integrated into the core Redis Open Source offering under this new tri-license structure.6 Redis Ltd. has stated its intention to maintain Redis Open Source under the AGPLv3 license moving forward, aiming to balance its commercial interests with open-source community expectations.10

3.2. Core Features and Capabilities

Redis is distinguished by its rich set of features, extending far beyond simple caching.

• Data Model: Redis is fundamentally an advanced key-value store but is more accurately described as a data structure server.1 Keys in Redis are always strings, while values can encompass a variety of complex data types.13 Both keys and values can have a maximum size of up to 512MB.4
• Supported Data Types:

• Basic Types:

• Strings: Binary-safe strings, serving as the foundation for many operations.1
• Hashes: Maps composed of field-value pairs, ideal for representing objects.1
• Lists: Ordered collections of strings, implemented as linked lists, supporting operations like push, pop, and range queries.1
• Sets: Unordered collections of unique strings, supporting operations like union, intersection, and difference.1
• Sorted Sets: Sets where each member is associated with a score, allowing them to be ordered by score. Useful for leaderboards or priority queues.1

• Advanced Types:

• Streams: An append-only log-like data structure, designed for managing high-volume, real-time event data. Streams support consumer groups, allowing multiple clients to cooperatively process messages, and offer message persistence.20
• HyperLogLogs: A probabilistic data structure used for estimating the cardinality (number of unique elements) of large sets with minimal memory usage.1
• Bitmaps (Bit arrays): Allow for bit-level operations on strings, useful for tracking binary state information efficiently.1
• Geospatial Indexes: Support for storing and querying geographical coordinates, enabling location-based searches and calculations (e.g., finding points within a radius).1

• Redis 8 (Open Source) Integrated Types: Previously part of Redis Stack, now core:

• JSON: Native support for storing, retrieving, and manipulating JSON documents within Redis, including path-based access and atomic updates.6
• Vector Sets: Extends sorted sets to store and query high-dimensional vector embeddings, crucial for AI/ML use cases like semantic search and recommendation systems.6
• Time Series: A data structure optimized for ingesting, querying, and aggregating time-stamped data, such as sensor readings or financial metrics.6
• Probabilistic Data Structures: Includes Bloom filters and Cuckoo filters (for set membership testing), Count-min sketch (for frequency estimation), Top-K (for finding most frequent items), and t-digest (for quantile estimation).6

• Persistence: Redis offers two main persistence mechanisms to ensure data durability 1:

• RDB (Redis Database Backup): Performs point-in-time snapshots of the entire dataset, saving it to a compact disk file at configured intervals (e.g., every 5 minutes if at least 100 keys changed). RDB files are generally faster to load on startup but can result in data loss for writes occurring between snapshots if the server crashes.
• AOF (Append Only File): Logs every write operation received by the server to a file on disk. The dataset can be reconstructed by replaying these commands. AOF offers better durability, as data can be fsynced to disk with various policies (e.g., every second, every write). AOF files can grow larger than RDB files and may be slower to restore, though Redis can rewrite AOF files in the background to compact them. Both RDB snapshotting and AOF rewriting are typically performed by a child process to minimize performance impact on the main Redis server.4

• Scalability and Replication:

• Replication: Redis supports asynchronous master-slave (primary-replica) replication by default.2 Data is first written to the primary and then propagated to one or more replicas. This enhances data availability and allows read scaling by directing read queries to replicas. The WAIT command can be used to achieve optional synchronous replication for specific operations, ensuring a command is replicated to a specified number of replicas before acknowledging to the client, reducing the risk of data loss in case of primary failure.13
• Redis Sentinel: A distributed system that provides high availability for Redis.1 Sentinel monitors primary and replica instances, detects failures, performs automatic failover (promoting a replica to primary), and provides configuration updates to clients so they can connect to the new primary.
• Redis Cluster: Implements a distributed, sharded Redis deployment.1 Data is automatically partitioned across multiple nodes (shards) using a hash slot mechanism (16384 slots). This enables horizontal scaling of both data storage and throughput. Redis Cluster is designed to continue operating even if a subset of nodes fails or is unable to communicate with the rest of the cluster, provided a majority of primaries are up and each unreachable primary has at least one reachable replica.

• Memory Management: Redis uses an encapsulated version of malloc/free for memory allocation.4 When Redis reaches its configured memory limit, it employs one of several configurable eviction policies to remove keys and free up space 4:

• noeviction: Returns errors on write commands when memory limit is reached.
• allkeys-lru: Evicts the least recently used (LRU) keys from the entire dataset.
• volatile-lru: Evicts LRU keys only from those that have an expiration set.
• allkeys-random: Evicts random keys from the entire dataset.
• volatile-random: Evicts random keys only from those with an expiration set.
• volatile-ttl: Evicts keys with an expiration set that have the shortest time-to-live (TTL).
• allkeys-lfu: Evicts the least frequently used (LFU) keys from the entire dataset (available in newer versions).
• volatile-lfu: Evicts LFU keys only from those with an expiration set (available in newer versions).

• Advanced Features:

• Publish/Subscribe (Pub/Sub): Implements a messaging paradigm where publishers send messages to channels, and subscribers receive messages from channels they are interested in, without direct knowledge of each other. This is useful for real-time notifications, chat systems, and event distribution.1
• Lua Scripting: Allows developers to execute complex sequences of commands atomically on the server-side using the Lua scripting language.1 This can reduce network round-trips and ensure atomicity for multi-step operations.
• Transactions: Provides a way to group multiple commands into a single atomic operation using MULTI, EXEC, DISCARD, and WATCH commands.2 WATCH allows for optimistic locking.
• Pipelining: Clients can send multiple commands to the server without waiting for the replies to each command individually, and then read the replies in a single step. This significantly reduces network latency by batching operations.5
• Redis Query Engine (Redis 8): Introduces capabilities for secondary indexing on data stored in Hashes and JSON data structures. It supports vector search, queries that return exact matches based on criteria or tags, and search queries that find the best matches by keywords or semantic meaning, including features like stemming and fuzzy matching.6

• Security:

• Open Source Redis (OSS):

• The fundamental security model for OSS Redis assumes it will be accessed by trusted clients within trusted environments; direct exposure to the internet or untrusted networks is strongly discouraged.1 Web applications are expected to mediate access between untrusted users and the Redis instance.22
• Network Security: Administrators should configure Redis to bind to specific network interfaces (e.g., 127.0.0.1 for local access only) and use firewalls to restrict access to the Redis port.22
• Protected Mode: Introduced in Redis 3.2.0, this mode is enabled by default. If Redis is not bound to a specific address and no password is configured, it will only reply to connections from loopback interfaces. Connections from other addresses will receive an error explaining the security risk and how to configure Redis properly.22
• Authentication: Redis supports password-based authentication via the AUTH command. A password can be set in the configuration file using the requirepass directive.
• Access Control Lists (ACLs): Introduced in Redis 6 and enhanced in Redis 8, ACLs allow for more granular control over user permissions. Users can be defined with specific passwords and restricted to executing certain commands or accessing specific key patterns.6
• Streams Security: Data within Redis Streams benefits from Redis’s general persistence and replication mechanisms, contributing to data safety and availability. However, specific security features like authentication or authorization for Streams are governed by the overall Redis security model (e.g., ACLs applying to Stream commands).23

• Redis Enterprise: Offers a more comprehensive suite of security features tailored for enterprise deployments 1:

• Login and Passwords: Includes policies for password complexity, password expiration, limiting password attempts, and session timeouts.
• Users and Roles: Provides robust user and role management, detailed explanations of cluster and database access, and the ability to create users and roles with specific privileges. Supports Redis ACLs and integration with LDAP for centralized authentication.
• Encryption and TLS: Enables TLS for encrypting data in transit, with options to configure TLS protocols and cipher suites. Supports encryption of private keys on disk and internode encryption for communication between cluster nodes.
• Certificates and Audit: Facilitates the creation, monitoring, and updating of SSL/TLS certificates, including support for OCSP stapling. Provides capabilities to audit database connections and other significant events.

3.3. Strengths

Redis offers several compelling advantages:

• Versatility: Its rich set of data types (Strings, Lists, Sets, Hashes, Sorted Sets, Streams, Geospatial, JSON, Vectors) and server-side operations allow it to be used for a wide array of applications beyond simple caching, including real-time analytics, leaderboards, message brokering, and even as a primary database for certain workloads.1
• Flexible Persistence: The availability of both RDB snapshotting and AOF logging provides flexible options for data durability, catering to different needs for data safety and recovery speed.1
• Scalability and High Availability: Built-in features like primary-replica replication, Redis Sentinel for automated failover, and Redis Cluster for sharding provide robust mechanisms for scaling out and ensuring high availability.1
• Advanced Functionality: Features such as Publish/Subscribe messaging, Lua scripting for server-side atomic operations, and transactions enhance its power and allow for complex application logic to be implemented efficiently.1
• Performance: As an in-memory data store, Redis delivers high throughput and sub-millisecond latency for most operations, making it suitable for performance-critical applications.1
• Strong Community and Ecosystem: Redis benefits from a large and active community, extensive documentation, and a wide range of client libraries for various programming languages. Redis Ltd. also provides commercial support and enterprise versions.8

3.4. Weaknesses

Despite its strengths, Redis has some limitations:

• Single-Threaded Command Execution: Historically, Redis processes commands in a single thread (though I/O operations and some background tasks can be multi-threaded, and Redis 8 includes further multi-threading improvements 9). This can become a bottleneck for CPU-bound workloads on multi-core servers, especially when executing complex Lua scripts or handling a very high number of concurrent connections, potentially offering lower raw throughput for simple operations compared to multi-threaded systems like Memcached.4
• Memory Usage: Due to its support for complex data structures and associated metadata, Redis may consume more memory than Memcached when storing simple key-value string data.4
• Complexity: The breadth of features, particularly when configuring and managing persistence, clustering (Redis Cluster), and high availability (Sentinel), can introduce a higher level of complexity compared to simpler systems like Memcached.4
• Licensing Uncertainty: The recent shifts in Redis’s open-source licensing (from BSD to RSALv2/SSPLv1, then to a tri-license including AGPLv3) and the resulting Valkey fork have created a degree of uncertainty and division within the community, which could impact future adoption and contribution patterns.9
• Default Asynchronous Replication: By default, replication is asynchronous. If a primary node fails before all write operations have been propagated to its replicas, some data loss can occur. While the WAIT command offers a degree of synchronous behavior, it’s not the default for all operations.13

3.5. Future Developments (Roadmap)

The development roadmap for Redis is actively pursued by Redis Ltd., both for its enterprise offerings and the open-source project.

• Redis Enterprise Software: Typically sees two major releases per year. The end-of-life (EOL) for each major Redis Enterprise Software version (6.2 and later) occurs 24 months after the formal release of the subsequent major version, with monthly maintenance releases provided on the last minor release of the current major version.1 Recent releases (e.g., versions in the 7.x series) have introduced significant features such as Auto Tiering (an enhanced successor to Redis on Flash), RESP3 protocol support, sharded publish/subscribe, enhancements to the Cluster Manager UI, and various security improvements including full TLS 1.3 support and more granular Redis ACL selectors.1
• Redis Open Source (Post-Redis 8 GA): The release of Redis 8 marked a significant step by integrating many features previously part of the source-available Redis Stack directly into Redis Open Source. This includes native support for Vector sets (enhancing AI/ML capabilities with semantic search), JSON data structures, Time Series data structures, and various Probabilistic data structures (like Bloom and Cuckoo filters).6 Redis 8 also introduced the Redis Query Engine for advanced data querying beyond simple key lookups, enhanced Access Control Lists (ACLs), and notable performance improvements, including reduced latency for many commands and further multi-threading enhancements for better CPU utilization.6 A key aspect of Redis 8 is the adoption of the AGPLv3 license as one of the licensing options.6
• Ecosystem Investments: Redis Ltd. continues to invest in the broader Redis ecosystem, ensuring that developer tools and resources such as official client libraries, the RedisInsight GUI, Redis Copilot, and the Redis for VS Code extension fully support the latest innovations in Redis.10

The trajectory of Redis clearly indicates an ambition to solidify its position as a comprehensive, real-time data platform, extending its capabilities far beyond its original role as a cache. The integration of modules like Search, JSON, and AI-focused Vector sets into the open-source core with Redis 8 6 strongly underscores this strategic direction. This evolution means Redis is increasingly competing not only with other caching solutions but also with specialized databases in fields like NoSQL, time-series analysis, and vector databases. Consequently, the comparison between Redis and Memcached is progressively becoming one of a specialized, high-performance cache versus an adaptable, multi-modal data platform.

The recent licensing turmoil and the emergence of the Valkey fork 9 represent a critical inflection point for the Redis ecosystem. Redis Ltd.’s stated aim is to balance open-source principles with its commercial interests.10 However, the momentum Valkey has gained, particularly with backing from major cloud providers, could lead to a fragmented landscape. Alternatively, it might compel Redis Open Source to maintain a strong commitment to openness and community alignment to remain competitive. The future will likely depend on Valkey’s development velocity and feature parity 11 and whether the AGPLv3 license for Redis is sufficient to retain and attract developers and large-scale users who prioritize more permissive licensing or fully open governance models.

Regarding its security model, open-source Redis heavily relies on the “trusted environment” assumption 22, effectively placing a significant portion of the security responsibility on network configuration and application-level mediation. While the introduction of ACLs marked an improvement, the more robust and comprehensive security features, such as advanced encryption options, LDAP integration, and detailed auditing, are primarily concentrated in the Redis Enterprise offerings.24 This differentiation positions enhanced security as a key value proposition for the commercial version, requiring users of open-source Redis to be particularly diligent in implementing their own layered security measures.

4. Memcached: Deep Dive

Memcached is a high-performance, distributed memory object caching system, widely recognized for its simplicity and speed in accelerating dynamic web applications by reducing database load.

4.1. Organization History and Evolution

Memcached was first developed by Brad Fitzpatrick for his website LiveJournal, with its initial release on May 22, 2003.7 It was originally written in the Perl programming language and later rewritten in C by Anatoly Vorobey, who was also employed by LiveJournal at the time.7

From its inception, Memcached was released as open-source software under a permissive revised BSD license.7 Unlike Redis, which has a specific company (Redis Ltd.) acting as its primary sponsor and commercial entity, Memcached is a community-driven project. Its development and maintenance are carried out by a diverse group of contributors from various organizations and individual developers.27 There is no single “Memcached company” steering its evolution; rather, it relies on the collective efforts of its open-source community.

Due to its effectiveness and simplicity, Memcached quickly gained widespread adoption and has been historically used by many large-scale websites and internet companies to improve performance and scalability. Notable users have included YouTube, Reddit, Facebook, Pinterest, Twitter, and Wikipedia.7

4.2. Core Features and Capabilities

Memcached is designed with a focus on simplicity and high performance for caching.

• Data Model: Memcached is a simple, distributed key-value store.3 It stores data as key-value pairs, where both keys and values are typically treated as opaque strings or byte arrays.4 Keys have a maximum size of 250 bytes, and values can be up to 1MB by default, although this item size limit can often be configured at startup.4
• Supported Data Types: Memcached primarily stores strings.4 If applications need to cache complex objects (like serialized programming language objects), the serialization and deserialization must be handled by the client application before storing data in Memcached and after retrieving it.3 Memcached itself does not understand complex data structures. However, it does support atomic incr (increment) and decr (decrement) commands, which operate on string representations of numbers stored in the cache.3
• Persistence: Memcached is designed as a volatile, in-memory cache.3 Data is not persisted to disk. If a Memcached server is shut down or crashes, all the data cached in its memory is lost.3 This is an intentional design choice to maximize speed and minimize overhead, as disk I/O is avoided.3 Applications using Memcached must be able to gracefully handle cache misses and regenerate or refetch data from a persistent backend store.
• Scalability:

• Multi-threaded Architecture: Memcached is multi-threaded, meaning it can effectively utilize multiple CPU cores on a server.3 This allows it to handle a large number of concurrent client connections and achieve high throughput, especially for workloads with many simple read and write operations.
• Distributed Caching: A Memcached deployment typically consists of multiple server instances running on different machines, forming a distributed cache pool.3
• Horizontal Scaling: Scaling out a Memcached cluster is achieved through client-side consistent hashing.3 The client library is responsible for determining which Memcached server a particular key should be stored on or retrieved from. The Memcached servers themselves are unaware of each other; there is no server-to-server communication for data distribution or synchronization.30 This design simplifies server operations and makes adding or removing nodes relatively straightforward from the server’s perspective.

• Memory Management:

• Slab Allocator: Memcached uses a memory allocation mechanism called the slab allocator.3 Memory is pre-allocated and divided into fixed-size chunks (slabs) for different item size classes. When an item is stored, it’s placed into a slab that best fits its size. This approach helps to minimize memory fragmentation and allows for efficient reuse of memory.
• LRU Eviction: By default, Memcached employs a Least Recently Used (LRU) eviction policy.3 When the cache becomes full and new data needs to be stored, Memcached will evict the least recently accessed items to make space.

• Key Operations: Memcached supports a concise set of commands for cache manipulation, all designed to be O(1) in terms of time complexity.30 Common operations include 3:

• set: Stores a key-value pair.
• get: Retrieves the value associated with a key.
• add: Stores a key-value pair only if the key does not already exist.
• replace: Updates an existing key-value pair only if the key already exists.
• delete: Removes a key-value pair from the cache.
• incr/decr: Atomically increments or decrements a numeric value associated with a key.

• Security:

• Basic Security Model: Traditionally, Memcached was designed with minimal built-in security features, assuming deployment within trusted network environments.31 Protection relied heavily on network isolation measures such as firewalls and configuring Memcached to listen only on private network interfaces.31
• SASL Authentication: Since version 1.4.3, Memcached has supported Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) for client authentication.3 Enabling SASL requires recompiling Memcached with SASL support. Once enabled, clients must authenticate successfully before they can issue commands to the server. It’s important to note that SASL in Memcached provides authentication but does not encrypt the data traffic between the client and server.30
• TLS Support: Memcached itself does not natively embed TLS encryption for its communication protocol. To encrypt Memcached traffic, external tools like stunnel (an SSL/TLS proxy) can be used to wrap connections in a TLS layer.31 Some third-party managed Memcached services, such as the one offered by BACTO.NET on the Azure Marketplace, provide TLS-encrypted connections as part of their offering.32 The official Memcached documentation mentions “TLS Support” as a feature 29, and its GitHub wiki has a TLS page that redirects to docs.memcached.org/features/tls/ for more details.33 Memcached can also be built with proxy features enabled, which could potentially be combined with external TLS solutions for secure communication.34
• Network Security Best Practices: It is crucial to configure Memcached to listen only on trusted network interfaces (e.g., localhost or a private IP address) and to use firewalls to restrict access to the Memcached port (default 11211) from untrusted sources.31
• Known Vulnerabilities: Unprotected Memcached instances exposed to the internet, particularly those with UDP enabled (though UDP is not enabled by default in recent versions and lacks authentication 35), have been exploited in the past to launch DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) amplification attacks.31 This underscores the critical need for proper security configurations.

4.3. Strengths

Memcached offers several key strengths:

• Simplicity: Its focused feature set and straightforward key-value model make Memcached easy to set up, use, and understand, especially for basic caching tasks.3
• High Performance for Simple Caching: The multi-threaded architecture allows Memcached to achieve excellent throughput and low latency for high-volume, simple key-value get/set operations, effectively utilizing multi-core servers.3
• Low Overhead: For caching simple string data, Memcached generally has less memory overhead per item compared to Redis, due to its simpler internal structures.4
• Scalability: Memcached scales horizontally effectively by adding more server nodes to the distributed pool. Client-side consistent hashing distributes the load efficiently across these nodes.3
• Mature and Stable: Having been in use since 2003, Memcached is a mature technology with a long history of deployment in large-scale, demanding environments, proving its stability and reliability.7

4.4. Weaknesses

Memcached also has notable limitations:

• No Data Persistence: Data stored in Memcached is volatile and is lost if a server restarts or crashes.3 This makes it unsuitable for use cases where data durability is a requirement.
• Limited Data Types: Memcached primarily handles string data. Caching complex data structures requires client-side serialization and deserialization, which can add overhead and complexity to the application logic.4
• No Advanced Features: It lacks the advanced functionalities found in Redis, such as transactions, publish/subscribe messaging, Lua scripting, complex server-side data operations (e.g., list or set operations), or built-in replication and high availability mechanisms beyond simple data distribution.4 Any replication or failover logic must be managed externally or implemented by the client application.3
• Basic Security Model: Memcached’s built-in security features are minimal. It relies heavily on network-level security measures. While SASL provides an authentication mechanism, it does not encrypt data in transit. Securing traffic with TLS typically requires the use of external proxies or tools.3
• Limited to LRU Eviction: Memcached primarily offers the Least Recently Used (LRU) eviction policy, providing less flexibility in managing cache memory compared to Redis’s multiple eviction strategies.4

4.5. Future Developments (Roadmap)

Memcached development is an ongoing, community-driven effort. Stable releases continue to be made, generally focusing on performance optimizations, bug fixes, and incremental enhancements rather than transformative new features. The official Memcached website indicates that the latest stable release is v1.6.38, dated March 19, 2025 29, demonstrating continued maintenance.

The project’s GitHub wiki 33 and release notes for past versions (e.g., v1.6.8 from October 2020, which included a security-related fix for UDP and minor improvements 35) illustrate this pattern of incremental progress. While older roadmap discussions, such as a Drupal.org issue tracker for “Memcache Storage Roadmap” (with updates up to 2018), mentioned potential future enhancements like a locking system, improved cache tag handling, and UI improvements for statistics 37, the current status and prioritization of these specific items within the core Memcached project are not clearly detailed in the provided materials. The overall development trajectory appears to be one of maintaining stability, reliability, and performance for its core use case, rather than rapid expansion into new functional areas.

Memcached’s enduring relevance is rooted in its unwavering commitment to simplicity and multi-threaded performance for its specific, well-defined task: distributed object caching. This focused approach is simultaneously its greatest strength and its primary limitation when contrasted with the continually evolving and expanding feature set of Redis. Its design philosophy, which emphasizes a simple key-value store, disconnected servers operating independently, and O(1) command performance 30, has allowed it to remain highly effective and resource-efficient for its intended purpose. However, this deliberate avoidance of complexities like data persistence or rich server-side data structures means it cannot adapt to the broader range of use cases that Redis now targets.

The security posture of Memcached, historically characterized by a reliance on “trusted network” deployments 31, has become a more significant consideration in contemporary, often zero-trust, environments. The default lack of authentication and its historical exposure on all network interfaces made improperly configured Memcached instances vulnerable, most notably to DDoS amplification attacks.31 The introduction of SASL for authentication 3 was a positive step. However, SASL in Memcached does not encrypt data in transit 30, necessitating the use of external solutions like stunnel for TLS encryption.31 This adds an additional operational layer, which can detract from Memcached’s inherent simplicity, especially when compared to the more integrated security features available in Redis Enterprise 24 or even the evolving ACLs and easier TLS setup options for Redis OSS in managed service contexts.

The development pace and direction of Memcached reflect its nature as a community-driven project focused on maintenance and incremental improvement, rather than the kind of transformative changes seen in Redis, which are often driven by Redis Ltd.’s commercial strategy and market expansion goals.6 This implies that Memcached will likely continue to excel in its established niche, offering stability and reliability for that core use case. Users should not anticipate it to spontaneously acquire features comparable to those found in Redis; its strength lies in doing one thing very well.

5. Point-by-Point Comparison: Redis vs. Memcached

A direct comparison of Redis and Memcached highlights their distinct philosophies and capabilities, guiding the selection process based on specific application needs.

• Data Model and Data Types:

• Redis: Functions as a data structure server 1, supporting a rich variety of data types including Strings, Lists, Sets, Sorted Sets, Hashes, Streams, HyperLogLogs, Bitmaps, Geospatial indexes, and, with Redis 8, native JSON and Vector Sets.1 This allows for complex operations to be performed directly on parts of data objects server-side, potentially reducing data transfer and client-side logic.4 Keys and values can be up to 512MB in size.4
• Memcached: Operates as a simple key-value store.3 It primarily stores data as strings; complex objects must be serialized and deserialized by the client application.4 Keys are limited to 250 bytes, and values are typically up to 1MB by default (though this can often be adjusted).4
• Consideration: Redis’s diverse data types enable more sophisticated server-side logic and can be more efficient for updating complex data structures, as only the changed part might need to be sent or manipulated.4 Memcached’s simplicity results in lower overhead for basic string caching but shifts the burden of handling complex data to the client.

• Performance Characteristics (Throughput, Latency, Concurrency):

• Both systems are designed for high performance and generally offer sub-millisecond latency for in-memory operations.5
• Redis: Command execution is predominantly single-threaded (though newer versions have introduced multi-threading for I/O and background tasks, with further improvements in Redis 8 9).4 This can become a bottleneck under very high concurrency with CPU-intensive operations (like complex Lua scripts). Some benchmarks have shown Redis exhibiting longer write times as the volume of records increases compared to Memcached in specific scenarios.5
• Memcached: Features a multi-threaded architecture, allowing it to utilize multiple CPU cores effectively for handling client requests.3 This generally leads to better performance and higher throughput when dealing with large datasets or a high volume of simple read/write operations from many concurrent connections.5
• Consideration: Memcached’s multi-threading often gives it an advantage in raw throughput for simple, high-concurrency caching workloads. Redis’s traditionally single-threaded command processing simplifies consistency models for individual commands but may require deploying more instances to scale CPU-bound workloads, although ongoing improvements are addressing this.

• Memory Efficiency and Management:

• Redis: May use more memory for simple string or hash data compared to Memcached due to the overhead of supporting richer data structures and metadata.4 However, Redis can be more memory-efficient during write operations when storing the same number of records, particularly as dataset size grows.5 It uses an encapsulated malloc/free mechanism for memory allocation and offers a variety of sophisticated eviction policies (e.g., LRU, LFU, TTL-based, random).4
• Memcached: Generally has lower memory overhead for storing simple string data.4 It employs a slab allocator to manage memory in fixed-size chunks, which helps combat fragmentation.3 However, it is primarily limited to the LRU (Least Recently Used) eviction policy.3 Memcached’s memory usage can increase substantially as the number of stored records grows.5
• Consideration: The “more memory efficient” system depends on the nature of the data and the operations performed. Memcached is leaner for caching simple strings. Redis might offer advantages for large numbers of small, structured items where its internal representations are optimized, and its advanced eviction policies provide more granular control over memory usage under pressure.

• Scalability and High Availability:

• Redis: Provides built-in, server-side solutions for scalability and high availability. Horizontal scaling is achieved through Redis Cluster, which automatically shards data across multiple nodes using a master-slave (primary-replica) architecture for each shard.1 High availability for non-clustered setups is provided by Redis Sentinel, which monitors instances and manages automatic failover.1 Replication is an integral feature.1
• Memcached: Scales vertically by leveraging its multi-threaded nature to use more CPU cores and memory on a single machine.4 Horizontal scaling is achieved via client-side consistent hashing; Memcached servers themselves are independent and unaware of each other.3 There is no built-in server-side replication or automatic failover mechanism; these functionalities must be handled by client logic or external third-party tools.3
• Consideration: Redis offers more integrated and automated solutions for high availability and sharding, which can simplify operations for these complex tasks but also adds complexity to the server setup itself. Memcached’s distributed model is simpler at the server level, but it shifts the responsibility for data distribution, routing, and failover handling to the client library or external management systems.

• Persistence and Durability:

• Redis: Offers robust data persistence options through RDB snapshots (point-in-time backups) and AOF logs (logging every write operation).1 When persistence is configured, Redis is not volatile and can recover its data after restarts or crashes.
• Memcached: Designed as a purely volatile in-memory cache; it has no built-in persistence mechanisms.3 All cached data is lost if a server shuts down or crashes.
• Consideration: This is a fundamental differentiator. Redis can be reliably used in scenarios where data durability is important (e.g., persistent session stores, message queues, or even as a lightweight primary database). Memcached is strictly suitable for ephemeral caching where data can be easily regenerated from another source.

• Security Features and Considerations:

• Redis OSS: Provides password authentication (AUTH command via requirepass), Access Control Lists (ACLs) for granular permissions (since Redis 6), a protected mode to prevent accidental exposure, and the ability to bind to specific network interfaces.6 It is generally designed for deployment within trusted network environments.
• Redis Enterprise: Builds upon OSS security with more comprehensive features, including TLS encryption for data in transit, advanced ACL capabilities, LDAP integration for centralized authentication, and detailed auditing features.1
• Memcached: Offers SASL (Simple Authentication and Security Layer) for authentication, but this mechanism does not include encryption of data in transit.3 Security heavily relies on network isolation (firewalls, private IP addresses).31 Encrypting Memcached traffic typically requires using external proxies like stunnel.31 Unsecured Memcached instances have been known to be vulnerable to DDoS amplification attacks.36
• Consideration: Redis, particularly its Enterprise version, offers a more comprehensive and integrated security model. Memcached’s security is more dependent on external measures and diligent network configuration. The choice may depend on the sensitivity of the cached data and the security infrastructure already in place.

• Ease of Use and Development:

• Redis: Its extensive feature set can imply a steeper learning curve. However, its rich client library support across many languages and powerful features like Lua scripting can simplify the development of complex application logic.2 Tools like RedisInsight (a GUI) can also aid in development and management.8
• Memcached: With a simpler API and fewer core concepts, Memcached is generally easier to get started with for basic caching tasks.3 Client libraries are also widely available for most popular programming languages.30
• Consideration: Memcached is simpler for its narrowly defined use case. Redis’s power and versatility come with increased complexity, but its advanced features can also lead to simpler and more efficient application logic for certain types of problems that would be difficult to solve with Memcached alone.

• Ecosystem and Community Support:

• Redis: Benefits from strong corporate backing from Redis Ltd., which drives development and offers commercial support. It has a large, active global community, extensive official and community-provided documentation, and a vast number of client libraries.8 The recent licensing changes have, however, caused some friction and led to the Valkey fork.9
• Memcached: Is a mature, long-standing open-source project with a broad user base and numerous contributors over many years.7 It does not have a single corporate sponsor in the way Redis does; its community is more decentralized.
• Consideration: Both systems have strong and mature communities. Redis Ltd.’s corporate backing provides focused development resources and commercial support avenues, but this has also been linked to the controversial licensing decisions. Memcached’s community is more traditionally decentralized. The emergence of Valkey 11 introduces a new, significant community-driven alternative in the Redis-compatible space, backed by major cloud vendors.

• Licensing:

• Redis: Historically, open-source Redis was under a BSD license. As of Redis 8, Redis Open Source is offered under a tri-license model: the Redis Source Available License v2 (RSALv2), the Server Side Public License v1 (SSPLv1), and the GNU Affero General Public License v3 (AGPLv3).6 RSALv2 and SSPLv1 are source-available but not OSI-approved and have restrictions on commercial use, particularly for managed service providers. AGPLv3 is an OSI-approved open-source license with strong copyleft provisions. Redis Enterprise is a commercial product with its own licensing terms.38
• Memcached: Distributed under a revised BSD license, which is a permissive, OSI-approved open-source license.7
• Valkey (Redis Fork): Distributed under the BSD license, aiming to continue the original open-source Redis licensing tradition.18
• Consideration: Licensing has become a major point of divergence. Memcached (and Valkey) offer a simple, permissive open-source license that allows for broad use with minimal restrictions. Redis’s current licensing for its open-source version is more complex and has been a point of contention. The AGPLv3 option provides an OSI-approved path for Redis Open Source, but its copyleft nature may not be suitable for all organizations. RSALv2 and SSPLv1 impose limitations that are critical for certain users (like cloud providers) to understand. This makes licensing a critical decision factor, especially for organizations with specific open-source compliance policies or commercial distribution plans.

The following table summarizes the key feature differences:

 

Feature	Redis	Memcached	Notes/Key Differences
Primary Use Case	Versatile: Cache, Database, Message Broker, Real-time Analytics, AI/ML 1	High-performance distributed object caching 3	Redis has a much broader range of applications due to its feature set.
Data Model	Advanced Key-Value (Data Structure Server) 1	Simple Key-Value Store 3	Redis treats values as complex data structures; Memcached treats them as opaque strings/bytes.
Data Types	Strings, Lists, Sets, Sorted Sets, Hashes, Streams, Geospatial, Bitmaps, HyperLogLogs, JSON, Vectors 1	Primarily Strings; client handles complex types via serialization 4	Redis’s rich data types enable server-side manipulation.
Persistence	Yes (RDB snapshots, AOF logging) 1	No (Volatile, in-memory only) 3	Critical differentiator: Redis can ensure data durability.
Scalability (Horizontal)	Redis Cluster (server-side sharding) 1	Client-side consistent hashing across independent servers 3	Redis offers integrated clustering; Memcached relies on client logic.
High Availability	Redis Sentinel (automatic failover), Redis Cluster 1	Client-side strategies or third-party tools 3	Redis provides built-in HA solutions.
Multi-threading	Predominantly single-threaded command execution; I/O and some tasks threaded; improvements in v8+ 4	Multi-threaded architecture 3	Memcached typically offers better raw throughput for simple operations on multi-core systems.
Transactions	Yes (MULTI/EXEC) 2	No	Redis supports atomic execution of multiple commands.
Scripting	Yes (Lua scripting) 1	No	Redis allows server-side custom logic.
Pub/Sub Messaging	Yes 1	No	Redis can function as a message broker.
Security (Built-in OSS)	AUTH (password), ACLs, Protected Mode 6	SASL authentication (no encryption) 3	Redis OSS has more built-in security features; Memcached relies more on network security and SASL for auth.
Licensing (Open Source)	Tri-license: RSALv2, SSPLv1, AGPLv3 (for v8+) 10	Revised BSD License 7	Significant difference: Memcached is permissive BSD. Redis’s AGPLv3 is OSI-approved but copyleft; RSAL/SSPL are source-available with restrictions.
Corporate Sponsor	Redis Ltd. 8	None (Community-driven) 27	Redis has focused corporate backing; Memcached is decentralized.

6. Pricing Models

Both Redis and Memcached offer open-source versions that are free to download and use, forming the foundation of their ecosystems. However, the costs associated with deploying and managing these systems can vary significantly based on whether one opts for self-hosting or managed cloud services, and in the case of Redis, whether the enterprise version is chosen.

• Open Source Availability:

• The core versions of both Redis and Memcached are available as open-source software, meaning there are no licensing fees to download, modify (within license terms), and run the software on one’s own infrastructure.4
• Redis Open Source: Versions 7.2.4 and earlier were distributed under the permissive 3-clause BSD license. Starting with later versions and culminating in Redis 8, Redis Open Source is offered under a tri-license model: the Redis Source Available License v2 (RSALv2), the Server Side Public License v1 (SSPLv1), and the GNU Affero General Public License v3 (AGPLv3).10 While AGPLv3 is an OSI-approved open-source license, RSALv2 and SSPLv1 are source-available licenses with specific restrictions, particularly concerning the provision of Redis as a commercial managed service.
• Memcached: Is consistently available under a revised BSD license, which is a permissive, OSI-approved open-source license.7

• Redis Enterprise Software:

• Redis Enterprise is a commercial product developed and supported by Redis Ltd., offering features beyond those in Redis Open Source, particularly in areas like enhanced security, scalability, high availability, management tools, and dedicated support.1
• It is typically offered via annual subscriptions. The pricing is primarily determined by the number of database shards (which can be a primary or replica process) required to support the application’s dataset and workload.38 The price per shard can vary based on factors such as the specific Redis Enterprise product tier, whether the shard is for production or non-production use, and the total number of shards in the deployment.38
• Redis Ltd. usually provides a 30-day free trial for Redis Enterprise Software for evaluation and development purposes within an internal environment.38

• Managed Cloud Services:
  Major cloud providers, including Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud Platform (GCP), and Microsoft Azure, offer fully managed services for both Redis and Memcached. These services abstract away the complexities of infrastructure management, setup, maintenance, patching, and scaling, allowing developers to focus on application development.

• General Pricing Factors: Pricing for managed in-memory cache services typically depends on several factors 12:

• Instance Size/Type: Based on the allocated vCPUs, memory capacity, and network performance of the cache nodes.
• Data Storage: Charges for the amount of data stored, often on a per GB-hour basis.
• Data Transfer: Costs for data transferred into (ingress) and out of (egress) the cache service, which can vary significantly depending on whether the transfer is within the same availability zone (AZ), across AZs within the same region, or across regions.
• Operational Charges: Some serverless models may include charges based on processing units or the number of requests.
• Discounts: Reserved instance pricing (committing to 1 or 3 years of use) and committed use discounts (CUDs) can offer substantial savings over on-demand hourly rates.39

• AWS ElastiCache:

• Provides managed services for Redis (ElastiCache for Redis), Memcached (ElastiCache for Memcached), and Valkey (ElastiCache for Valkey).39
• Node-based Pricing: Offers a variety of cache node types (e.g., cache.t4g.micro, cache.m6g.large) with distinct hourly on-demand and reserved instance costs.39 For instance, cache.t4g.micro (0.5 GiB RAM, 2 vCPUs) might have an on-demand cost of $0.0160/hour for Memcached or Redis.39
• ElastiCache Serverless: A pay-as-you-go option where pricing is based on two main metrics: data stored (per GB-hour) and ElastiCache Processing Units (ECPUs, per million ECPUs).40 For Memcached, data storage is priced at $0.125 per GB-hour, and ECPUs at $0.0034 per million ECPUs. Redis OSS serverless pricing is similar. Valkey serverless is offered at a lower price point (e.g., $0.084 per GB-hour for data stored).40
• Additional Costs: Backup storage is charged (e.g., $0.085 per GiB per month). Data transfer costs apply and vary based on traffic patterns.40

• Google Cloud Memorystore:

• Offers Memorystore for Redis and Memorystore for Memcached.41
• Memorystore for Memcached: Pricing is based on the number of vCPUs per node and the amount of memory per node, on an hourly basis, and varies by region.41 For example, in the us-central1 (Iowa) region, a vCPU might cost around $0.050 per hour, and memory for nodes up to 4 GB might cost $0.0044 per GB per hour, while memory for nodes larger than 4 GB might cost $0.0089 per GB per hour (example pricing, subject to change).41 There is generally no charge for network ingress to or egress from Memorystore itself, but egress charges from other Google Cloud services (like Compute Engine) to Memorystore may apply.41
• Memorystore for Redis: Pricing depends on the service tier (Basic or Standard), provisioned capacity (GB), and region. Costs are accrued per GB per hour, with different rates for various capacity tiers (e.g., M1, M2, M3, M4, M5). Enabling read replicas for Standard Tier instances incurs additional costs per node.43

• Azure Cache for Redis:

• Microsoft Azure offers Azure Cache for Redis, which includes tiers developed in partnership with Redis Inc. (Enterprise and Enterprise Flash tiers) that support Redis Enterprise features.12 This makes Azure the first major cloud provider to offer a licensed, multi-tiered Redis service directly integrated with Redis Ltd.’s advanced capabilities.44
• It provides multiple pricing tiers (Basic, Standard, Premium, Enterprise, Enterprise Flash) and options for reserved pricing to offer flexibility and cost control.12 The Azure Managed Redis offerings (generally available) are designed to leverage multi-core utilization, aiming for higher throughput and a lower total cost of ownership (TCO) compared to single-threaded Redis OSS architectures.44
• Memcached on Azure: While Azure does not offer a first-party managed Memcached service analogous to Azure Cache for Redis, third-party managed Memcached solutions are available through the Azure Marketplace. For example, BACTO.NET offers a managed Memcached service on dedicated instances with features like TLS encryption and automatic backups; pricing for such offerings is determined by the third-party provider.32

• Other Providers (e.g., Upstash for Redis):

• Specialized managed Redis providers like Upstash also exist, offering various pricing models. Upstash, for instance, has a free tier (e.g., 256 MB data size, 500K commands per month), a pay-as-you-go model (e.g., $0.2 per 100K commands), and fixed-size plans (e.g., a 250MB instance for $10 per month). They also offer enterprise plans with custom pricing.45

While open-source versions of Redis and Memcached are “free” in terms of licensing costs, the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for self-hosting these systems can be substantial. Self-hosting involves capital expenditures for hardware, as well as ongoing operational costs for power, cooling, and, crucially, skilled personnel for initial setup, configuration, monitoring, patching, security hardening, and scaling. Managed cloud services effectively convert these upfront and ongoing costs into operational expenditures (OpEx). While the direct costs of managed services might appear higher on a per-instance basis, they offer significant benefits in terms of convenience, rapid provisioning, automated scalability, built-in high availability, and often, enhanced security features and management tooling, which can reduce the indirect TCO. The most “cost-effective” choice depends heavily on an organization’s scale of operations, in-house technical expertise, and its preference for CapEx versus OpEx financial models.

The pricing models for managed Redis services are generally more complex and tiered than those for managed Memcached services. This difference reflects Redis’s broader feature set and more varied deployment options, such as support for clustering, different persistence levels, read replicas, and access to enterprise-grade modules or features. For example, managed Memcached services like Google Cloud Memorystore for Memcached are often priced relatively simply based on vCPU and memory capacity.41 In contrast, managed Redis services like Azure Cache for Redis or Google Memorystore for Redis typically offer multiple tiers (e.g., Basic, Standard, Premium, Enterprise) that correspond to different levels of functionality and performance characteristics.12 This tiering allows users to select and pay for the specific level of Redis capability they require but also necessitates more careful consideration during the selection process.

The emergence of Valkey 11 as a BSD-licensed, Redis-compatible alternative, notably supported by major cloud providers like AWS and Google Cloud 9, has the potential to influence the pricing and feature offerings of managed Redis-like services in the long term. AWS ElastiCache already lists Valkey as an engine option, and in some serverless configurations, it is priced more competitively than Redis OSS (e.g., Valkey data storage at $0.084/GB-hour versus Redis OSS at $0.125/GB-hour on ElastiCache Serverless 40). If Valkey achieves widespread adoption and maintains strong feature parity with Redis, cloud providers might promote it more actively. This could create competitive pressure on Redis Ltd.’s own commercial offerings and its licensed versions available on cloud marketplaces, potentially leading to more cost-effective or feature-rich options for users who prefer or require a permissively licensed core for Redis-like functionality.

The following table provides a high-level overview of managed cloud service pricing:

 

Cloud Provider	Service Name(s)	Supported Engines	Key Pricing Components	Free Tier/Trial Availability
AWS	Amazon ElastiCache	Redis, Memcached, Valkey 39	Node type (vCPU, memory, network), Serverless (GB-hours, ECPUs), Data Transfer, Backups 39	AWS Free Tier may include limited ElastiCache usage.
Google Cloud	Memorystore	Redis, Memcached 41	vCPUs/hour, Memory GB/hour (Memcached); Service Tier, Capacity GB/hour (Redis) 41	Google Cloud Free Tier may include limited Memorystore usage.
Microsoft Azure	Azure Cache for Redis; 3rd Party Memcached (Marketplace)	Redis (incl. Enterprise) 12; Memcached (via 3rd party) 32	Tier (Basic, Standard, Premium, Enterprise), Cache size, Data Transfer (Redis) 12; Provider-specific (3rd party Memcached) 32	Azure Free Account offers credits; specific free tiers for Cache for Redis may be available. 3rd party trials vary. 12

7. Use Cases

Redis and Memcached, while both in-memory data stores, cater to different sets of use cases due to their distinct feature sets and design philosophies.

7.1. Common Use Cases for Both

The primary shared application for both Redis and Memcached is caching, aimed at improving application performance and reducing load on backend systems.

• Database Query Caching: Storing the results of frequently executed or computationally expensive database queries. When the same query is requested again, the result can be served directly from the cache, bypassing the database.2
• Web Page Caching / HTML Fragment Caching: Caching entire rendered web pages or frequently accessed parts of web pages (HTML fragments) to speed up page load times for users.3
• Object Caching: Storing frequently accessed objects, such as user profiles, product information, or configuration data, in memory for quick retrieval.
• Session Management: Storing user session data for web applications, allowing for fast access to session information across multiple requests or even multiple application servers.3 However, if session persistence across server restarts is required, Redis is the more suitable choice due to its persistence capabilities.

7.2. Redis-Specific Use Cases

Redis’s advanced features and diverse data types enable a much broader range of use cases beyond simple caching:

• Real-time Analytics: Its ability to process data with sub-millisecond latency makes Redis ideal for real-time analytics dashboards, tracking user activity on websites, analyzing financial transactions as they occur, and implementing real-time fraud detection systems.1
• Leaderboards & Counting: Redis Sorted Sets are perfectly suited for implementing real-time leaderboards in games or other competitive applications, as well as for maintaining various types of counters (e.g., likes, views) that require atomic increment operations and fast ranking.2
• Message Brokering:

• Publish/Subscribe (Pub/Sub): Redis provides robust Pub/Sub capabilities, allowing for the distribution of messages in real-time for applications such as chat systems, live notifications, and broadcasting updates to multiple clients.1
• Redis Streams: A more durable and powerful messaging solution than Pub/Sub, Redis Streams are append-only log-like data structures that offer message persistence and support for consumer groups (similar to Apache Kafka but often simpler to manage for certain use cases). They are suitable for reliable message queuing and event sourcing architectures.6

• Geospatial Indexing: With built-in support for geospatial data types and commands (like GEOADD, GEORADIUS, GEOSEARCH), Redis can be used to build location-aware applications, such as ride-sharing services, local business finders, or proximity-based notifications.1
• Full-Page Cache (FPC): While Memcached can cache HTML, Redis can also be used for FPC, potentially with more sophisticated cache invalidation logic leveraging its varied data structures and commands.4
• Machine Learning / Artificial Intelligence:

• Feature Store: Redis can serve as a low-latency online feature store for ML models, providing quick access to precomputed features during model inference.
• Vector Database: With the introduction of native vector sets and an enhanced query engine in Redis 8, Redis is increasingly being used as a vector database. This allows for storing, indexing, and searching high-dimensional vector embeddings, which are crucial for AI applications like semantic search, recommendation systems, image recognition, and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) in Generative AI applications.6

• Rate Limiting: More sophisticated and flexible rate limiting logic can be implemented using Redis’s atomic increment operations (like INCR) and its ability to set expirations on keys.
• Queuing: Redis Lists can be used as simple, reliable queues for background job processing, supporting atomic push and pop operations (e.g., LPUSH, RPUSH, BRPOP).

7.3. Memcached-Specific Use Cases

Memcached’s strengths in simplicity and multi-threaded performance make it particularly well-suited for the following:

• High-Throughput Simple String Caching: It excels in scenarios that require caching large volumes of relatively simple string-based data where raw speed, low latency, and high concurrency are paramount.4
• API Rate Limiting (Basic): Storing and atomically incrementing counters for basic API call limits per user or IP address.4
• Caching HTML Fragments: Efficiently storing and serving small, frequently accessed pieces of dynamically generated web pages to reduce rendering time.4
• Ephemeral Session Store: Suitable for storing user session data when it is acceptable for sessions to be lost if a cache server restarts (i.e., session data is short-lived or can be easily reconstructed).4

The expanding feature set of Redis, especially in domains like vector search 6 and complex querying capabilities, is clearly positioning it as a fundamental component in modern AI/ML and real-time data processing stacks. This trajectory takes Redis far beyond the traditional caching domain that Memcached primarily occupies. While Memcached’s use cases have remained largely consistent, focusing on accelerating web applications by caching database query results or rendered HTML content 3, Redis has strategically added data types and functionalities like Streams for event-driven architectures 20, Geospatial indexes for location-based services 1, and now native Vector sets for sophisticated AI applications.6 This deliberate expansion allows Redis to address a significantly wider array of complex problems, effectively creating new applications for an “in-memory data store” that Memcached is not designed to handle.

Even for shared use cases such as session management, the choice between Redis and Memcached is often dictated by the application’s tolerance for data loss, which directly influences whether Redis (with its persistence options) or Memcached (which is volatile) is the more appropriate solution. Both can store session data.3 However, because Memcached is volatile 3, if a Memcached server holding session data fails, those sessions are irrecoverably lost from the cache. This might be acceptable if sessions are short-lived or can be easily re-established without significant user impact. In contrast, Redis can persist session data to disk 1, ensuring that sessions can survive server restarts or crashes. This durability is crucial for applications like e-commerce shopping carts or any system where losing active session state would lead to a poor user experience or data loss. Thus, even within a common use case, the specific requirement for data durability becomes a key factor favoring Redis.

For highly complex systems, a hybrid architectural approach, leveraging both Redis and Memcached for different caching tiers or distinct purposes, can be a sophisticated and effective solution.5 In such a setup, Memcached might be employed as a “front-line” cache for very hot, simple, and frequently accessed string data (e.g., small HTML fragments or API responses) due to its excellent multi-threaded performance and low overhead for these types of items. Simultaneously, Redis could be used for more complex caching needs, such as storing user profiles as hash objects, managing session data that requires persistence, acting as a backend for real-time leaderboards, or serving as a message queue. This strategy allows an organization to capitalize on the specific strengths of each technology, tailoring the caching layer to the unique characteristics of different data types and access patterns, albeit at the cost of increased operational complexity in managing two different caching systems.

The following table provides a suitability matrix for various use cases:

 

Use Case	Suitable for Redis?	Suitable for Memcached?	Key Considerations/Why
Database Query Caching	Yes	Yes	Both are effective. Redis might offer more flexibility if cached data needs manipulation or complex eviction.
Web Page/Fragment Caching	Yes	Yes	Memcached excels at simple, high-volume fragment caching.4 Redis can handle more complex page caching logic.
Session Management (Ephemeral)	Yes	Yes	Memcached is simpler if persistence is not needed.4
Session Management (Persistent)	Yes	No	Redis’s persistence is essential here.1
Real-time Analytics	Yes	No	Redis’s speed and data structures (e.g., sorted sets, streams) are ideal.1
Leaderboards/Counting	Yes	No	Redis Sorted Sets provide efficient ranking and scoring.2 Memcached incr/decr is too basic for leaderboards.
Message Brokering (Pub/Sub)	Yes	No	Redis has built-in Pub/Sub.1
Message Queuing (Streams/Lists)	Yes	No	Redis Streams offer robust, persistent queuing; Lists offer simpler queuing.20
Geospatial Indexing	Yes	No	Redis has dedicated geospatial data types and commands.1
Vector Search/AI	Yes	No	Redis 8+ offers native vector sets and query engine for AI/ML.6
Complex Object Caching	Yes	Yes (client-side)	Redis Hashes are efficient for objects.4 Memcached requires client-side serialization/deserialization.30
High-Volume Simple String Caching	Yes	Yes	Memcached’s multi-threading often gives it a performance edge here.4 Redis is also capable.

8. Customer Reviews and Case Studies

Real-world adoption and experiences provide valuable context for evaluating Redis and Memcached.

8.1. Redis

Redis has seen extensive adoption across various industries, with over 30,000 businesses, including prominent names like British Airways, HackerRank, and MGM Resorts International, relying on its capabilities.13 It is also widely available as a managed service on major cloud platforms such as AWS ElastiCache for Redis, Microsoft Azure Cache for Redis, and Alibaba Cloud ApsaraDB for Redis.2

Several case studies highlight Redis’s impact:

• Editoo Case Study: This company experienced high latency issues with its relational database management system (RDBMS) as its user base and application usage grew. By migrating to Redis, Editoo achieved a significant reduction in downtime, notable improvements in application performance, and subsequently planned further migrations of data from its RDBMS infrastructure into Redis.2 This case study underscores Redis’s effectiveness in alleviating bottlenecks associated with traditional databases and enhancing overall system responsiveness.
• Financial Services Load Testing: A financial services company conducted load testing using Redis for real-time transaction processing. The system, utilizing the redis-benchmark tool, demonstrated that Redis could handle over 100,000 requests per second while maintaining minimal latency under optimal configurations. The study also identified that beyond this threshold, latency began to increase, indicating the need for horizontal scaling strategies for even greater loads.47 This demonstrates Redis’s high throughput capacity for demanding workloads.
• Social Media Platform Stress Testing for Failover: A social media platform relying on Redis for session management implemented a Redis Sentinel setup to ensure high availability. During stress tests where a primary Redis instance failure was simulated, the system successfully failed over to a replica in approximately 2 seconds. While some sessions were temporarily unavailable during this brief failover window, the case study validated Redis Sentinel’s capability to manage failovers effectively.47
• University Benchmarking Study: A research team compared Redis with traditional relational databases and other NoSQL solutions, focusing on read and write performance across various data models. The benchmarks consistently showed Redis outperforming other databases in terms of speed for simple key-value operations. However, the study also noted that for complex queries involving joins or aggregations, traditional relational databases still held an advantage.47 This confirms Redis’s strength in low-latency operations for its core data models.
• CodeRower Client Projects: Development firm CodeRower reported significant performance gains for its clients by implementing Redis. These included 5 to 10 times faster application response times, an average latency reduction of 85%, and a 300% improvement in throughput across projects utilizing Redis for caching, session management, and leaderboards.46
• General Benefits Cited by Users: Common themes in positive Redis adoption stories include its unmatched speed, scalability, and flexibility. It is frequently credited with reducing database load by as much as 90% and enabling applications to handle millions of concurrent users efficiently.46

8.2. Memcached

Memcached has a long history of use in large-scale web environments, having been implemented by major cloud and web service companies such as Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, Flickr, and Craigslist, primarily to reduce latency and alleviate the load on backend database and application servers.7 It is important to note that while these companies were early adopters, their caching strategies may have evolved over time.

User experiences with Memcached often highlight:

• Benefits for High-Traffic Websites: The core advantage of Memcached for high-traffic websites is improved performance through significantly reduced response times achieved by serving data from RAM. This leads to a better user experience and increased engagement. Additionally, by reducing the number of requests to databases or APIs, Memcached lessens the load on backend servers, which can improve overall system stability and capacity to handle traffic.15
• EngineYard Fine-Tuning: An article from EngineYard discusses the importance of fine-tuning Memcached configurations, such as the slab growth factor (-f) and connection throttling settings (-R), to suit specific application datasets. Proper tuning can help reduce cache evictions and connection yields, leading to a smoother running environment. This implies that default Memcached settings may not always be optimal and require adjustment based on workload characteristics.48
• DDoS Attack Vector (Operational Consideration): A critical aspect highlighted in the context of Memcached is its potential misuse as a vector for DDoS amplification attacks if instances are left unsecured and exposed to the internet, particularly with UDP enabled. High-profile attacks targeting organizations like GitHub and Arbor Networks have utilized Memcached servers, leveraging their high bandwidth amplification factor.36 This is not a positive review but an important operational consideration that underscores the necessity of robust security practices when deploying Memcached.

It is worth noting that some customer testimonials found on cloud provider pages, such as AWS ElastiCache customer stories 42, now prominently feature migrations from “ElastiCache for Redis OSS” to “ElastiCache for Valkey” (the community-driven fork of Redis). These customers often cite significant cost optimizations (ranging from 20% to 50% reduction) and performance improvements with Valkey. While these are positive endorsements for Valkey and reflect the dynamic nature of the Redis ecosystem, they should not be mistaken for reviews of Memcached. They are relevant in the broader context of in-memory caching choices, particularly for users seeking Redis compatibility with a permissive open-source license.

The pattern emerging from these real-world applications is that Redis case studies increasingly emphasize its utility in complex scenarios that extend beyond simple caching. Examples include its use in real-time analytics, highly available session management, and even as a primary data store for certain functions.2 This reflects Redis’s evolution into a multi-modal data platform. In contrast, Memcached case studies consistently focus on its core strength: accelerating high-traffic websites and applications through simple, fast, and distributed object caching.15

The security implications associated with Memcached, particularly its historical vulnerability as a DDoS amplification vector when improperly secured 36, represent a recurring theme in operational discussions. This highlights the critical importance of diligent configuration and robust network security measures when deploying Memcached. While Redis also requires careful security considerations, particularly for its open-source version in trusted environments 22, its case studies tend to focus more on the benefits derived from its features rather than on overcoming widely exploited inherent security weaknesses. This may suggest a different historical perception of risk or different primary attack surfaces between the two systems.

The positive sentiment and reported benefits surrounding migrations to Valkey on platforms like AWS 42, often framed as cost and performance improvements over “Redis OSS,” signal a potential competitive challenge to Redis Ltd.’s offerings. This is particularly relevant for users who prioritize Redis compatibility combined with a permissive open-source license and strong cloud provider backing. This trend, while not a direct review of Memcached or Redis per se, reflects the evolving and dynamic ecosystem in which these technologies operate and is an important factor for decision-makers to consider.

9. Conclusion and Recommendations

The choice between Redis and Memcached as an in-memory data store is a nuanced decision that depends heavily on specific application requirements, operational capabilities, and strategic considerations such as licensing and long-term ecosystem stability. Both are mature, high-performance systems, but they cater to different needs and philosophies.

Summary of Key Strengths and Weaknesses:

• Redis:

• Strengths: Unmatched versatility due to an extensive array of complex data types (Lists, Sets, Hashes, Sorted Sets, Streams, Geospatial, JSON, Vectors); robust data persistence options (RDB and AOF); advanced functionalities such as Publish/Subscribe messaging, Lua scripting, transactions, and an emerging AI/ML focus with vector search; integrated solutions for high availability (Sentinel) and horizontal scalability (Cluster).
• Weaknesses: Historically single-threaded command execution (though this is evolving with multi-threading improvements in recent versions like Redis 8) can be a bottleneck for certain CPU-bound workloads compared to Memcached’s inherently multi-threaded design; potentially higher operational complexity due to its rich feature set; recent licensing changes (introduction of RSALv2, SSPLv1, and AGPLv3) have created community uncertainty and led to the Valkey fork.

• Memcached:

• Strengths: Exceptional simplicity in its design, deployment, and API; excellent multi-threaded performance for high-throughput, low-latency caching of simple key-value string data; lower memory overhead for basic string storage; mature, stable, and proven in very large-scale environments.
• Weaknesses: Lack of any built-in data persistence (strictly volatile); limited to primarily string data types, requiring client-side serialization for complex objects; absence of advanced features like transactions, scripting, or messaging; basic built-in security model that heavily relies on network-level hardening and external tools for robust authentication and encryption.

Guidance on Choosing:

The decision can be guided by answering the following key questions regarding application needs:

1. Do you require complex data structures and server-side operations on them?

• If yes (e.g., manipulating lists, sets, sorted sets for leaderboards, hashes for objects, geospatial queries, native JSON, or vector embeddings for AI), Redis is the clear choice.1 Memcached’s simple string model is insufficient here.

1. Is data persistence critical for your use case?

• If yes (e.g., for durable session stores, message queues, or using the store as a fast primary database), Redis with its RDB and AOF persistence mechanisms is necessary.1 Memcached is volatile and offers no persistence.3

1. Do you need advanced features like Publish/Subscribe messaging, Lua scripting, atomic transactions, or persistent message streams?

• If yes, Redis provides these capabilities natively.1 Memcached lacks these features.

1. Is your primary need extremely high-throughput, low-latency caching of simple strings or serialized objects, where leveraging multiple server cores for maximum concurrency is paramount?

• If yes, Memcached‘s multi-threaded architecture often provides an advantage.3 While Redis is also very fast, its traditional single-threaded command processing model might require different scaling strategies for equivalent raw throughput in such scenarios.

1. Is utmost simplicity in deployment, management, and API for a caching layer the highest priority?

• If yes, Memcached‘s focused feature set generally makes it simpler to get started with and operate for basic caching.5

1. What are your licensing requirements?

• If a permissive, BSD-style open-source license is a strict requirement, Memcached 7 or the Valkey fork of Redis 18 are suitable.
• If an OSI-approved copyleft license like AGPLv3 is acceptable, Redis Open Source (version 8+) is an option.10
• If source-available licenses with commercial restrictions (RSALv2, SSPLv1) are viable, or if a commercial license with enterprise support is preferred, then Redis Ltd.’s offerings (including Redis Enterprise) are relevant.10 This has become a critical non-technical decision point.

1. Are you building AI/ML applications that require native vector search capabilities or an integrated JSON and Query Engine?

• If yes, Redis (version 8 and later), with its newly integrated features like vector sets and the Redis Query Engine, is specifically targeting these emerging use cases.6

Considerations for Licensing, Security Posture, and Operational Complexity:

• Licensing: The shift in Redis’s licensing strategy is a significant factor. Organizations must carefully evaluate the terms of RSALv2, SSPLv1, and AGPLv3 against their open-source policies and commercial intentions.10 Memcached’s BSD license and Valkey’s BSD license offer greater simplicity and fewer restrictions in this regard.
• Security Posture: Redis Enterprise provides the most comprehensive, integrated security features.24 Open-source Redis requires diligent hardening and assumes deployment in trusted environments, although its ACLs offer good granularity.22 Memcached’s security relies heavily on robust network isolation and often requires external tools like stunnel for TLS and careful SASL configuration for authentication, as its built-in capabilities are more basic.30 The historical exploitation of unsecured Memcached instances for DDoS attacks underscores this need.36
• Operational Complexity: Memcached is generally simpler to operate for its core caching function due to its limited scope.5 Redis, with its richer feature set including clustering, persistence options, and advanced data types, can be more complex to configure and manage optimally, though its power often justifies this complexity.4 Managed cloud services can significantly abstract away operational burdens for both systems.

Potential for Hybrid Approaches:

For complex application architectures, a hybrid strategy employing both Memcached and Redis can be highly effective.5 In such a model, Memcached could be used for high-volume, low-latency caching of simple, frequently accessed data (e.g., HTML fragments, basic API responses) where its multi-threaded performance shines. Redis could then handle more complex caching requirements, such as storing structured objects (user profiles as hashes), managing persistent sessions, powering real-time features like leaderboards or analytics, or serving as a message broker. This allows an organization to leverage the distinct strengths of each technology, though it introduces the overhead of managing two different systems.

The Valkey Factor:

The emergence of Valkey as a community-led, BSD-licensed fork of Redis 7.2.4, backed by major cloud providers and former Redis contributors, is a significant development in the in-memory data store landscape.9 Valkey aims to provide a truly open-source alternative that maintains compatibility with Redis while fostering an open governance model. Its rapid progress in delivering releases and building a community 11 makes it a compelling option for users concerned about Redis Ltd.’s licensing strategies or those who prioritize a permissively licensed, Redis-compatible core with strong cloud vendor support. The future development and feature parity of Valkey should be closely monitored by organizations evaluating Redis-like solutions.

Final Recommendation Emphasis:

Ultimately, there is no universally “best” choice between Redis and Memcached. The optimal solution is highly contextual and depends on a thorough assessment of specific technical requirements, performance needs, data characteristics, durability expectations, operational capabilities, security policies, budget constraints, and philosophical alignment with different open-source licensing models. This report has aimed to provide the comprehensive data and analysis necessary for technical decision-makers to make an informed choice that best aligns with their unique circumstances. The decision is no longer a simple technical trade-off but involves navigating a dynamic ecosystem shaped by commercial strategies, open-source philosophies, and community responses. While Memcached remains a highly effective specialized tool for caching, Redis is clearly on a trajectory to become a foundational real-time data platform, capable of consolidating functionalities that might otherwise require multiple specialized data stores, albeit with an increase in its own inherent complexity. Security must be a proactive, day-one consideration for both, but the approach and available toolsets differ significantly.

Works cited

1. What is Redis Explained? | IBM, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/redis
2. Redis case study | SQL, accessed May 23, 2025, https://campus.datacamp.com/courses/nosql-concepts/key-value-databases?ex=10
3. What is Memcached? | GeeksforGeeks, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/what-is-memcached/
4. Memcached vs Redis: which one to choose? – Imaginary Cloud, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.imaginarycloud.com/blog/redis-vs-memcached
5. Redis Vs Memcached In 2025 – ScaleGrid, accessed May 23, 2025, https://scalegrid.io/blog/redis-vs-memcached/
6. Redis 8 is now GA, loaded with new features and more than 30 performance improvements, accessed May 23, 2025, https://redis.io/blog/redis-8-ga/
7. Memcached – Wikipedia, accessed May 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memcached
8. Redis (company) – Wikiwand, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Redis_(company)
9. Redis Is Open Source Again. But Is It Too Late? – Support Tools, accessed May 23, 2025, https://support.tools/redis-open-source-again/
10. Redis Licensing Overview, accessed May 23, 2025, https://redis.io/legal/licenses/
11. Forking Ahead: A Year of Valkey – Linux Foundation, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/a-year-of-valkey
12. Azure Cache for Redis, accessed May 23, 2025, https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/cache
13. The Good and the Bad of Redis In-Memory Database – AltexSoft, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.altexsoft.com/blog/redis-pros-and-cons/
14. Redis vs. Memcached in Microservices Architectures: Caching Strategies – International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation www.allmultidisc, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.allmultidisciplinaryjournal.com/uploads/archives/20250328124001_F-23-218.1.pdf
15. High Traffic Websites: Memcached to the Rescue – Alibaba Cloud, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.alibabacloud.com/tech-news/a/memcached/gu2nz665bz-high-traffic-websites-memcached-to-the-rescue
16. Configuration and Deployment Guide For Memcached on Intel® Architecture, accessed May 23, 2025, https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/671319/dec-2013-update-configuration-and-deployment-guide-for-memcached.pdf
17. Redis (company) – Wikipedia, accessed May 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redis_(company)
18. Valkey, accessed May 23, 2025, https://valkey.io/
19. Redis has moved to yet another open source license, changing course from 2024 switch, accessed May 23, 2025, https://dev.lucee.org/t/redis-has-moved-to-yet-another-open-source-license-changing-course-from-2024-switch/15109
20. What are Redis streams? – Redisson PRO, accessed May 23, 2025, https://redisson.pro/glossary/redis-streams.html
21. Redis Streams :: Spring Data Redis, accessed May 23, 2025, https://docs.spring.io/spring-data/redis/reference/redis/redis-streams.html
22. Redis security | Docs, accessed May 23, 2025, https://redis.io/docs/latest/operate/oss_and_stack/management/security/
23. Redis Streams | Docs, accessed May 23, 2025, https://redis.io/docs/latest/develop/data-types/streams/
24. Security | Docs – Redis, accessed May 23, 2025, https://redis.io/docs/latest/operate/rs/security/
25. Redis Enterprise Software product lifecycle | Docs, accessed May 23, 2025, https://redis.io/docs/latest/operate/rs/installing-upgrading/product-lifecycle/
26. Release notes | Docs – Redis, accessed May 23, 2025, https://redis.io/docs/latest/operate/rs/release-notes/
27. a distributed memory object caching system – memcached, accessed May 23, 2025, https://memcached.org/about
28. Performance Analysis of Memcached – cs.wisc.edu, accessed May 23, 2025, https://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~vijayc/papers/memcached.pdf
29. memcached – a distributed memory object caching system, accessed May 23, 2025, https://memcached.org/
30. Memcached Documentation, accessed May 23, 2025, https://docs.memcached.org/
31. Secure Your Memcached Deployments – Alibaba Cloud, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.alibabacloud.com/tech-news/a/memcached/gu2nz65vq8-secure-your-memcached-deployments
32. Memcached – Microsoft Azure Marketplace, accessed May 23, 2025, https://azuremarketplace.microsoft.com/en/marketplace/apps/bactonet1668782193190.memcached-stackhero?tab=Overview
33. Home · memcached/memcached Wiki · GitHub, accessed May 23, 2025, https://github.com/memcached/memcached/wiki
34. Built-in proxy quickstart – Memcached Documentation, accessed May 23, 2025, https://docs.memcached.org/features/proxy/quickstart/
35. ReleaseNotes168 · memcached/memcached Wiki – GitHub, accessed May 23, 2025, https://github.com/memcached/memcached/wiki/ReleaseNotes168
36. Memcached: An Experimental Study of DDoS Attacks for the Wellbeing of IoT Applications, accessed May 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8659833/
37. Memcache Storage Roadmap [#1974254] | Drupal.org, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.drupal.org/project/memcache_storage/issues/1974254
38. Software Pricing – Redis, accessed May 23, 2025, https://redis.io/enterprise/pricing/
39. Amazon ElastiCache Instance Comparison, accessed May 23, 2025, https://instances.vantage.sh/cache/
40. Amazon ElastiCache Pricing Breakdown: Ultimate Guide 2025 – Cloudchipr, accessed May 23, 2025, https://cloudchipr.com/blog/amazon-elasticache-pricing
41. Memorystore for Memcached pricing – Google Cloud, accessed May 23, 2025, https://cloud.google.com/memorystore/docs/memcached/pricing
42. Valkey-, Memcached-, and Redis OSS-Compatible Cache – Amazon ElastiCache Customers, accessed May 23, 2025, https://aws.amazon.com/elasticache/customers/
43. Memorystore for Redis pricing – Google Cloud, accessed May 23, 2025, https://cloud.google.com/memorystore/docs/redis/pricing
44. Azure Managed Redis is GA today, accessed May 23, 2025, https://redis.io/blog/azure-managed-redis-is-ga-today/
45. Pricing – Upstash, accessed May 23, 2025, https://upstash.com/pricing/redis
46. High-Performance Redis Services for Scalable Applications – CodeRower, accessed May 23, 2025, https://coderower.com/technologies/redis-services/
47. Rich Case Studies in Redis Testing Research – USAVPS.COM, accessed May 23, 2025, https://usavps.com/blog/108637/
48. Fine-Tuning Memcached – EngineYard, accessed May 23, 2025, https://www.engineyard.com/blog/fine-tuning-memcached/