Company Overview
SingleStore (formerly MemSQL) is a distributed SQL database company founded in 2011 by ex-Facebook engineers Nikita Shamgunov, Adam Prout, and Eric Frenkiel forgeglobal.comthebrandhopper.com. Headquartered in San Francisco, SingleStore has remained a privately-held firm and has raised over $460 million in funding from investors such as Goldman Sachs, Accel, Google Ventures, and IBM Ventures forgeglobal.comblocksandfiles.com. A major rebranding occurred in October 2020 when MemSQL officially became SingleStore, reflecting a broadened focus beyond in-memory technology businesswire.comen.wikipedia.org.
Today, SingleStore is led by CEO Raj Verma, with founder Adam Prout serving as CTO (co-founder Nikita Shamgunov led the company until 2019 before pursuing a new startup) businesswire.commadrona.com. The company has achieved “unicorn” status – in 2022 it reached a valuation above $1.3 billion after a Series F funding round blocksandfiles.com. SingleStore has grown rapidly, reportedly surpassing $100 million in annual revenues, as it capitalizes on the demand for real-time data solutions madrona.com. With approximately 380 employees worldwide and offices spanning North America, Europe, and Asia en.wikipedia.orgen.wikipedia.org, SingleStore remains focused on delivering a “database of now” for modern, data-intensive applications.
Product Overview
SingleStore’s core offering is SingleStore DB, a cloud-native, distributed relational database designed for both transactional and analytical workloads on the same platform. Key features and architectural highlights include:
-
Hybrid Workload (HTAP) Engine: SingleStore combines high-performance OLTP (row-store in-memory tables) with scalable OLAP (columnar tables on disk) in one system blocksandfiles.com. This unified engine enables real-time analytics on live operational data, eliminating the need for separate databases and ETL delays. The database delivers single-digit millisecond reads/writes for operational queries while also handling complex analytical joins and aggregations efficiently singlestore.com.
-
Distributed, Cloud-Native Architecture: The system uses a shared-nothing cluster of nodes to partition and replicate data for scale and resilience. It can be deployed on-premises or across clouds (including a managed service SingleStore Helios), and even in containerized environments via Kubernetes en.wikipedia.org. Compute and storage are tightly integrated for low-latency access, in contrast to the decoupled warehouse approach. SingleStore supports flexible deployment models including a “bring your own cloud” option for its managed service en.wikipedia.orgtwingo.co.il.
-
Universal Storage & Data Model: SingleStore can ingest and store structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data within a single database. It supports relational rows and columns alongside JSON documents, time-series data, geospatial objects, key–value data, and even vectors for AI workloads en.wikipedia.orginfoworld.com. This versatility, combined with full ANSI SQL compliance, means developers can use standard SQL across diverse data types.
-
Performance and Concurrency: The platform is optimized for speed at scale. It is known for extremely fast data ingestion (in the order of tens of GB/sec) and high throughput query processing (hundreds of thousands of TPS) in benchmarks thebrandhopper.com. SingleStore’s memory-first design (with disk spillover) and vectorized query execution enable interactive response times on large data sets. Its architecture supports high concurrency for mixed read/write workloads, making it suitable for analytical applications that serve many users or real-time dashboards blocksandfiles.com.
-
Unique Features: SingleStore offers built-in capabilities that often require separate systems. For example, it has integrated full-text search indexes, geospatial functions, and vector similarity search for machine learning use cases en.wikipedia.orgen.wikipedia.org. It also provides change data capture pipelines for streaming ingest (e.g. from Apache Kafka), and recently introduced SingleStore Kai – a MongoDB API layer that enables using SingleStore as a JSON document database with Mongo-compatible queries infoworld.cominfoworld.com. Notably, SingleStore’s MySQL-wire protocol support allows drop-in replacement of MySQL/MariaDB, simplifying adoption and migration aws.amazon.com.
-
High Availability and Security: In production, SingleStore can be configured for HA with replication across nodes and instant failover en.wikipedia.orgen.wikipedia.org. It provides enterprise security features such as encryption at rest/in-transit, role-based access control, and auditing. Deployments can be isolated in the customer’s VPC for security or run in multi-tenant cloud instances. (SingleStore has achieved SOC2 compliance and integrates with tools like HashiCorp Vault for key management, according to company reports.)
Overall, SingleStore’s unique selling proposition is a “single store for all data” – a converged database that delivers transactional and analytical performance in one system insightpartners.com. This simplifies data infrastructure by consolidating workloads that previously required multiple specialized databases (e.g. replacing an OLTP store + data warehouse + caching layer with one platform) singlestore.com. By offering a familiar SQL interface and compatibility with popular tools, SingleStore positions itself as a drop-in modern upgrade for organizations seeking real-time, scalable analytics without sacrificing transactional capabilities.
Use Cases
SingleStore’s versatility makes it applicable across many industries where real-time data processing and analytics are critical. Common use cases include:
-
Financial Services (FinTech and Trading): Firms use SingleStore for algorithmic trading platforms, risk analytics, and payment processing where millisecond-level decisions are needed on fresh data. For example, hedge funds and banks can run complex analytics on streaming market data and transactions in one system. SingleStore’s high concurrency and fast aggregations support real-time risk management and fraud detection. (Insight Partners notes SingleStore can power everything from “high-speed BI dashboards to real-time analytics for algorithmic trading”, blending historical and up-to-the-moment data insightpartners.com.)
-
IoT and Telemetry Data: Manufacturing, energy, and telecom companies leverage SingleStore for handling massive time-series and sensor data. Its ability to ingest millions of events per second and perform on-the-fly analytics makes it ideal for predictive maintenance, anomaly detection, and network monitoring. A large telecom (a “Top 10 CSP”) reportedly replaced an Oracle Exadata system with SingleStore to achieve real-time network analytics for its 5G rollout singlestore.comsinglestore.com.
-
Web & Digital Analytics: SingleStore powers SaaS analytics platforms and observability tools that demand sub-second query responses even as data volumes grow. Uber is a marquee example – it embedded SingleStore at the core of its Apollo real-time analytics platform to monitor and react to live marketplace metrics (e.g. surge pricing conditions) with ingest latency reduced from minutes to seconds singlestore.com. Uber’s system keeps ~7 weeks of recent data in SingleStore to allow ad-hoc analysis of geospatial and time-series trends (for instance, computing hourly trip counts by city in real time) singlestore.comsinglestore.com. Similarly, analytics SaaS provider Fathom Analytics migrated from MySQL+Redis+DynamoDB to SingleStore to serve website traffic stats instantly; after moving to SingleStore’s cloud service, Fathom cut query times from 20+ minutes to milliseconds for its largest customers jackellis.gumroad.comsinglestore.com.
-
Advertising and Marketing Tech: Real-time campaign analytics and customer segmentation are another area. Skai, an omnichannel advertising platform, adopted SingleStore on AWS to power client-facing dashboards and saw a 50% reduction in infrastructure costs while improving query speeds aws.amazon.comaws.amazon.com. Using SingleStore’s scalable SQL engine, Skai’s customers can analyze live ad performance data across social, search, and e-commerce channels and get up-to-the-second insights (e.g. adjusting bids or creative in real time). Other marketing tech firms like 6sense and Heap similarly use SingleStore to enable interactive analytics in their products singlestore.comsinglestore.com.
-
Cybersecurity and Observability: Cybersecurity providers use SingleStore for threat detection dashboards and log analytics that require both heavy data ingest and fast querying. For example, Imperva, a security company, faced scalability limits with Cassandra for its cloud WAF analytics and turned to SingleStore to achieve sub-second query performance on streaming security event data twingo.co.il. After migrating to a cloud-native SingleStore solution, Imperva can interactively analyze attack traffic and metrics across global sites, giving their customers real-time visibility into threats twingo.co.iltwingo.co.il. The ability to quickly add new metrics and run flexible queries on recent data helped Imperva improve agility against evolving cyber attacks.
-
Retail and E-commerce: Large retailers (one “Top 10 retailer” is cited) use SingleStore for inventory tracking, personalization, and supply chain analytics singlestore.comsinglestore.com. Because SingleStore handles both the transactional updates (e.g. sales, stock levels) and the analytical queries, retailers can get live business intelligence – such as up-to-date inventory across stores or real-time recommendations based on a shopper’s current behavior. This reduces data lag in decision-making (for instance, flagging out-of-stock items or adjusting prices dynamically).
-
Machine Learning and AI Applications: An emerging use case is using SingleStore as a feature store or real-time data source for AI/ML. With its new vector similarity search and JSON support, SingleStore can store embeddings and serve nearest-neighbor lookup queries for AI models (such as for recommendation engines or semantic search) en.wikipedia.orginfoworld.com. Its partnership with IBM’s watsonx.ai exemplifies this – SingleStore is integrated to provide a high-speed database for AI applications, enabling enterprises to feed their ML models with up-to-date, pre-aggregated data directly en.wikipedia.org. This is valuable in use cases like personalized content, fraud detection models, or AI-driven customer support, where the latest data needs to be available to algorithms with minimal latency.
In summary, organizations choose SingleStore when they require fast, interactive access to large and rapidly-changing datasets. Industries ranging from finance, telecommunication, and e-commerce to SaaS and cybersecurity have deployed SingleStore to unify their transactional and analytical workloads. By doing so, they achieve outcomes like drastically lower query response times, simplified data pipelines, and the ability to react to business events in real time (e.g. dynamic pricing, alerting, personalized user experiences) insightpartners.comsinglestore.com.
Customer Base
SingleStore’s customer base spans Fortune 500 enterprises, mid-size tech companies, and high-growth startups, underscoring its broad applicability. Notable customers and deployments include:
-
Tech & Internet Leaders: Companies like Uber (ride-sharing), Hulu (streaming media), Comcast (telecom/media), and Disney are reported users of SingleStore’s technology thebrandhopper.com. These firms deploy SingleStore to glean real-time insights from massive user activity streams – for example, analyzing viewer behavior on a video platform or operational metrics in a global service. At Uber, SingleStore supports hundreds of metrics (riders, drivers, trips, etc.) with second-level latency, enabling operational decisions such as reallocating drivers during demand spikes singlestore.comsinglestore.com.
-
Financial Services and Telecom: Global financial institutions (including a top-tier investment bank and payment providers) have adopted SingleStore to modernize legacy systems. A Tier 1 bank achieved over $40 million/year cost savings by migrating from a traditional Oracle database to SingleStore for certain workloads singlestore.com. In telecommunications, companies like Siemens and certain large carriers use SingleStore to handle network event data and analytics, especially as they transition to cloud-based 5G infrastructure singlestore.com.
-
Data-Driven Startups & SaaS Providers: SingleStore is popular in the analytics and SaaS startup ecosystem. For instance, Fathom Analytics rebuilt its entire backend on SingleStore to become “the world’s fastest website analytics” service, consolidating three databases into one singlestore.comsinglestore.com. This switch allowed Fathom to serve customer queries in <0.5 seconds (down from minutes) and cut their cloud costs substantially singlestore.com. Other SaaS companies like Heap (analytics), Outreach (sales analytics), Matific (education), and Jigsaw (dating app) have published case studies highlighting how SingleStore helped them scale to millions of users or events while maintaining snappy performance for end-users singlestore.comsinglestore.com.
-
Enterprise Partnerships: SingleStore has also formed strategic partnerships where its database is embedded in larger solutions. For example, SAS – a leader in analytics software – partnered with SingleStore to integrate its database engine for accelerating SAS’s advanced analytics workloads singlestore.com. Similarly, IBM not only invested in SingleStore but also includes it in offerings like IBM Cloud Pak for Data and the watsonx.ai stack, so IBM clients can use SingleStore’s high-speed database alongside IBM’s AI and analytics tools blocksandfiles.comblocksandfiles.com. These partnerships validate SingleStore’s technology in demanding enterprise contexts and expose it to a wider customer audience.
-
User Testimonials: Across its customer base, SingleStore is praised for delivering orders-of-magnitude improvements in speed and simplicity. Skai’s data infrastructure manager noted that after moving to SingleStore, they gained a scalable, high-performance data platform that supports “rapid scaling, real-time analytics, and ease of maintenance” without constant hardware upgrades aws.amazon.comaws.amazon.com. Fathom’s co-founder Jack Ellis described SingleStore as “the database of our dreams” after it enabled tens of thousands of inserts per second and replaced the need for separate caching and NoSQL systems, all at “a fraction of the cost” singlestore.comsinglestore.com. Such testimonials underscore how SingleStore helps clients simplify their architecture and accelerate performance, whether the use case is customer-facing analytics or internal BI.
In summary, SingleStore’s customers range from digital natives (e.g. Uber, Hulu) to established enterprises (banks, telcos). They use SingleStore to power use cases that demand speed at scale, and many have publicly attested to significant gains in performance, cost efficiency, and data infrastructure simplification blocksandfiles.comsinglestore.com.
Competitive Comparison
SingleStore operates in a competitive landscape that includes cloud data warehouses and data lake platforms. Below is a comparison of SingleStore with two prominent players – Snowflake and Databricks – across architecture, pricing, performance, data capabilities, security, integrations, and AI/ML features.
SingleStore vs. Snowflake
Overview: Snowflake is a cloud-only data warehouse platform, whereas SingleStore is a unified database for transactions and analytics (HTAP). Snowflake excels at scalable analytics on large data volumes, while SingleStore emphasizes real-time analytics on live data with high throughput updates insightpartners.comsinglestore.com. Their core differences include:
-
Architecture: Snowflake uses a decoupled storage and compute architecture on cloud object storage. Data is stored in Snowflake’s proprietary compressed columnar format on S3/Azure Blob/GCS, and compute clusters (“virtual warehouses”) are spun up as needed for queries. This design enables nearly infinite scale-out for batch queries and independent scaling of storage or compute. SingleStore, in contrast, uses a distributed SQL database architecture with nodes that manage both in-memory and on-disk storage. It maintains data in memory (rowstore) for hot transactional workloads and on SSDs in a columnstore for analytics blocksandfiles.com. Compute and storage are tightly integrated for low-latency operation. One implication is that SingleStore can handle high concurrency and fast single-record operations (typical in OLTP) better than Snowflake, which is optimized for heavier analytical queries. Snowflake is a multi-tenant SaaS service (with your data managed inside Snowflake’s cloud environment), whereas SingleStore can be self-managed in a customer’s own cloud or on-premises, or run as a managed service in the customer’s VPC (giving more control over data placement) en.wikipedia.orgtwingo.co.il.
-
Pricing Model: Snowflake popularized a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on consumption. Users are charged credits for the compute time their queries use (with warehouses that can auto-suspend when idle) and separately for data storage twingo.co.il. This provides flexibility – you only pay when you run queries – but costs can spike with heavy usage or always-on workloads. SingleStore offers a more predictable pricing approach. In its managed service, pricing is often based on provisioned throughput or node size, meaning performance is optimized at a fixed cost twingo.co.iltwingo.co.il. For on-prem or BYOC deployments, enterprise licenses allow using your own cloud resources (which can reduce cost if you have reserved instances) twingo.co.il. In practice, organizations with steady 24/7 workloads (e.g. constantly ingesting streams and serving queries) may find SingleStore’s model more cost-effective, whereas spiky, infrequent analytical jobs might be cheaper on Snowflake. SingleStore’s CEO has claimed a 50% lower TCO using SingleStore versus a combo of MySQL (for transactions) plus Snowflake (for analytics) in scenarios that require both blocksandfiles.com.
-
Performance: Both platforms deliver high performance, but for different use cases. Snowflake is tuned for complex SQL over very large datasets, and can scale up a big compute cluster to crunch through petabytes, making it excellent for heavy batch analytics and BI reporting. However, Snowflake has higher latency for small transactions and continuous updates, as data must be micro-batched into its columnar store. SingleStore shines at real-time workloads: it can ingest streaming data and make it immediately available for querying, with ingest latencies often in seconds or less singlestore.com. Its indexes and memory optimizations allow sub-second query responses on operational queries that would be too slow on Snowflake (which lacks traditional indexes). In user evaluations, SingleStore is noted as “fast enough for real-time analytics applications, whereas Snowflake [is] not fast enough for real-time data” in scenarios requiring instant responses singlestore.cominsightpartners.com. For pure analytics (e.g., a nightly report aggregating a billion rows), Snowflake and SingleStore may perform similarly on queries, but SingleStore’s advantage is that it can handle those queries while simultaneously powering transactional workloads – something Snowflake is not designed to do.
-
Data Handling & Flexibility: Snowflake primarily deals with structured and semi-structured data. It allows storing JSON, Avro, or XML in a special
VARIANT
column and querying it with SQL, and it can also materialize external tables from data lakes. SingleStore also supports JSON as a native type (and, with the MongoDB API in SingleStore Kai, can act as a JSON document store) infoworld.cominfoworld.com. Moreover, SingleStore can handle time-series and geospatial data with specialized functions, and has built-in full-text search indexes en.wikipedia.org, reducing the need to integrate additional databases for those features. Snowflake does not natively offer full-text search or spatial indexes (though it can be achieved through UDFs or external extensions). Snowflake’s focus is on large-scale analytical storage, whereas SingleStore’s is on versatile, operational storage. Additionally, SingleStore’s new support for Apache Iceberg tables means it can query data in data lakes or data lakehouses more efficiently en.wikipedia.org, blurring the line between database and lake. Snowflake, for its part, introduced its own external table and Iceberg support (Snowflake Iceberg) in 2023, but that is evolving. In summary, SingleStore provides more elasticity in data model (schema flexibility with SQL, JSON, key-values, etc.) in one engine, while Snowflake provides a very powerful but more specialized analytics engine for structured data warehousing. -
Security & Governance: Both Snowflake and SingleStore offer robust security for enterprise use. Snowflake operates on a zero-trust model within its cloud and supports features like end-to-end encryption, fine-grained access controls, data masking, and even customer-managed keys (in its higher editions). It’s a fully managed service with certifications (ISO, SOC2, HIPAA, etc.) that make it easy for enterprises to onboard. SingleStore, when self-deployed, allows the customer to manage security (network isolation, encryption keys, etc.) to their standards; in managed Helios, it similarly provides encryption, RBAC, SSO integration, and is SOC2 compliant. One differentiator is deployment control: security-sensitive organizations might choose SingleStore in a private cloud or on-prem for compliance (e.g., keeping data in-country or in their own VPC). Snowflake now offers virtual private deployments for large customers, but generally your data resides in Snowflake’s environment. Both platforms integrate with data governance tools and catalogs (Snowflake has its Data Exchange and tagging for governance; SingleStore can integrate with Apache Atlas, etc.). In summary, basic security features are comparable (authentication, authorization, encryption), though Snowflake being a closed SaaS means you rely on Snowflake’s certifications, whereas SingleStore can fit into custom security architectures more flexibly.
-
Integrations & Ecosystem: Snowflake has a rich ecosystem integration, especially in the BI and data science space. It offers standard connectors (ODBC/JDBC, Python, etc.), and many ETL/ELT tools (Fivetran, Informatica, Talend, etc.) and BI tools (Tableau, PowerBI) directly integrate with Snowflake. Snowflake’s Data Sharing feature also allows sharing data across accounts seamlessly, creating a data marketplace/network effect. SingleStore integrates via MySQL protocol, meaning it works out-of-the-box with MySQL-compatible clients and ORMs, and has connectors for Kafka (SingleStore Pipelines for streaming ingest), Spark, and etc. SingleStore is often used in tandem with Apache Kafka for streaming data and with visualization tools like Looker or Superset for analytics. The ecosystem around SingleStore is smaller than Snowflake’s but growing; for instance, IBM’s partnership means SingleStore can be procured as part of IBM solutions blocksandfiles.com, and SAP and SAS have also worked on integrations. Additionally, SingleStore’s ability to run anywhere makes it integrable into multi-cloud architectures — e.g. using SingleStore as a fast cache in front of a data lake, or as the real-time serving layer alongside Snowflake (in fact, SingleStore and Snowflake announced a partnership to make SingleStore a real-time front-end for Snowflake, combining Snowflake’s long-term storage with SingleStore’s low-latency query engine) singlestore.com. In short, Snowflake offers a broad partner ecosystem and data sharing capabilities, whereas SingleStore focuses on interoperability (via SQL, MySQL API, and new MongoDB API) to plug into existing data stacks.
-
AI/ML Capabilities: Snowflake and SingleStore are approaching AI/ML from different angles. Snowflake provides the ability to bring computation to data with its Snowpark API – allowing data scientists to run Python, Java, or Scala within Snowflake on the data – and has integrations with ML partners (it acquired Streamlit for interactive apps, partners with DataRobot, etc.). Snowflake is used as a feature store by some, and it recently enabled training ML models in-database (with Python stored procedures). SingleStore does not have built-in ML execution engines, but it enables AI/ML by serving data at speed to ML applications. Its support for vector indexes means you can store embeddings and do similarity searches for AI use cases (like recommendation or generative AI retrieval) directly in SQL en.wikipedia.org. SingleStore has positioned itself as a real-time data layer for AI – for example, it’s part of IBM’s AI stack to feed Watson AI models with data en.wikipedia.org. Also, by supporting both SQL and JSON, SingleStore can help ML applications that need to mix structured data with unstructured (features, documents, etc.). In summary, Snowflake offers in-warehouse ML processing capabilities (good for data prep and model scoring inside the database), whereas SingleStore provides features to serve AI applications in production (fast vector lookup, real-time data for inference). An organization focused on developing and training models might lean Snowflake (or Databricks), while one focused on deploying AI-driven features in a live app (needing low latency database responses) might favor SingleStore as part of the solution.
SingleStore vs. Databricks
Overview: Databricks is a unified data processing and AI platform built around Apache Spark and data lakehouse technology (Delta Lake), whereas SingleStore is a database system with its own storage engine. In essence, Databricks specializes in big data batch processing, ETL, and machine learning workflows, and has extended into SQL analytics, while SingleStore started from the database side, supporting fast SQL queries and transactions, and has extended into semi-structured and AI use cases. Key comparisons include:
-
Architecture: Databricks implements the Lakehouse architecture – it uses data lakes (cloud object storage with Delta Lake format) as the storage layer and Apache Spark as the processing engine on top. Users spin up clusters or use serverless SQL endpoints to run queries or machine learning tasks on files in the data lake. This is excellent for large-scale data transformation and model training, because it can leverage distributed computing on arbitrary volumes of data, but it relies on a batch-oriented engine. SingleStore uses a database architecture – data is ingested and stored in a persistent, highly indexed form inside the SingleStore cluster. Queries are answered via a SQL engine without needing to scan entire files on a data lake; instead, SingleStore maintains indexes, memory caches, and data distribution to optimize queries. The result is that for highly interactive, low-latency queries (single record lookups, real-time updates) SingleStore is far faster and more efficient. Databricks, while it has a SQL interface (Databricks SQL) that can handle many concurrent queries, still has higher latency overhead (because it’s Spark under the hood, which has been improving but was not originally designed for sub-second transactions). On the flip side, Databricks can handle unstructured data and huge petabyte-scale workloads that might be less practical to manage inside a database. In summary, Databricks = schema-on-read, multi-modal compute on a data lake, versus SingleStore = pre-indexed, memory-optimized storage with SQL compute. Many organizations actually use them together (e.g. using Databricks to prep and train on big data, then loading results or serving data via SingleStore for fast access).
-
Pricing: Databricks uses a consumption-based pricing model measured in DBUs (Databricks Units) which are basically compute time normalized for the type of instance. This means costs scale with usage of clusters for notebooks, jobs, or SQL endpoints. Heavy machine learning training or continuous streaming jobs on Databricks can become expensive, similar to Snowflake’s model. SingleStore’s pricing, as noted earlier, tends to be fixed per cluster or per throughput in the cloud, which might be more predictable for always-on application use. If a company needs a 24/7 high-throughput serving layer (e.g. a SaaS app backend), running that on Databricks would mean keeping clusters running constantly, incurring high DBU costs, whereas a SingleStore cluster could be more cost-efficient for that scenario twingo.co.iltwingo.co.il. Conversely, if a company runs large analytic jobs once a day or ad-hoc, Databricks might allow them to only pay when those jobs run. Pricing also ties to architecture: SingleStore can leverage reserved cloud resources (or on-prem hardware) efficiently, while Databricks as a service abstracts that into usage units.
-
Performance: The two excel in different dimensions of performance. Databricks (with Delta Lake and Spark SQL) has made great strides in analytics performance – it can run TPC-DS like benchmarks competitively with data warehouses, especially at very large scale, and it can even outperform traditional warehouses on some large queries due to Spark’s parallelism. But for transactional performance (HTAP), Databricks is not designed to handle high rates of single-row updates or very low-latency selects. SingleStore delivers extremely fast responses for operational queries (its design target is often sub-10ms reads/writes for small operations) and can sustain high QPS on mixed workloads singlestore.com. In a comparative sense, SingleStore’s performance is superior for real-time applications where consistent low latency and concurrency are required (e.g. an app API doing hundreds of queries per second per user). Databricks performance shines when you need to process a huge dataset in bulk (e.g. join a fact table of 100 billion rows with a dimension table of 1 billion rows) – tasks that SingleStore can do, but might be limited by memory or require more careful data modeling to fit in a cluster. It’s telling that SingleStore’s team noted that all modern SQL engines (Snowflake, Redshift, etc.) are within 10-20% of each other on traditional benchmarks, and Databricks has now “caught up to the table stakes features of a SQL data warehouse” on those benchmarks singlestore.com. The differentiator is that SingleStore also handles high-throughput ingest and point queries concurrently, which pure data-lake solutions struggle with.
-
Use Case Alignment: Because of these differences, the ideal use cases diverge. Databricks is often chosen for data engineering pipelines, big data analytics, and machine learning development. For example, if a company is building a recommendation model from terabytes of clickstream data, Databricks provides the tools to clean the data, train the model (with MLlib or via integrating with PyTorch/TensorFlow), and manage the whole ML lifecycle (via MLFlow). SingleStore is often chosen for customer-facing applications or real-time dashboards where consistent performance is needed. If 1000 users are each making queries that join fresh data with reference data (say, personalized analytics in a SaaS app), SingleStore will deliver that reliably, whereas Databricks SQL might have higher query latency or require very large clusters to match the responsiveness. In practice, many enterprises use Databricks for offline processing (ETL, feature engineering, training) and then use SingleStore to serve data or live analytics as part of their application stack. One could say Databricks is more data scientist and data engineer-oriented, while SingleStore is more application developer and database engineer-oriented.
-
AI/ML and Analytics Features: Databricks has a rich suite of AI/ML features – notebooks, automated machine learning, the MLflow platform for experiment tracking, and recent integration of Generative AI support (they released Dolly, their own LLM, and acquired MosaicML to offer model training as a service). It’s a go-to platform for building and deploying machine learning models on big data. SingleStore does not offer model training or notebooks, but it complements AI by storing and serving data to models. With the addition of vector search, SingleStore can serve as a realtime vector database to support AI applications (for example, retrieving relevant embeddings for an AI agent) infoworld.com. SingleStore also supports stored procedures and user-defined functions, which can be used for simple ML inference logic or data transformations in SQL. If the question is an analytics capability: Both can do SQL analytics, but Databricks connects to visualization tools or requires exporting results, while SingleStore can be directly queried by dashboards as a live database. Notably, SingleStore’s integration with tools like Apache Spark (via pipelines) means if advanced analytics beyond SQL are needed, one can connect Spark to SingleStore as well aws.amazon.com – effectively using SingleStore as a fast storage layer for Spark jobs. In summary, Databricks is a complete AI/ML development platform, whereas SingleStore is a high-speed analytics database that can slot into an AI/ML solution primarily as the data serving layer.
-
Ecosystem Compatibility: Databricks emphasizes open data formats (Delta/Parquet) and interoperability – one can use various engines (Spark, SQL, streaming) on the same data. It integrates with tools like dbt for data transformations, and has an ecosystem of connectors (Kafka for streaming ingest, Koalas for pandas-like usage, etc.). SingleStore is compatible with many tools through standard protocols – for instance, it can be the target of Kafka streams via built-in connectors, or work with Python (via MySQL connectors or JDBC) in an AI pipeline. A recent move is SingleStore’s support for Apache Iceberg, which means it can query and even continuously ingest data from an Iceberg data lake table en.wikipedia.org. This is a convergence pattern: SingleStore reaching into the data lake world, and Databricks (with Delta Sharing and SQL endpoints) reaching into the data warehousing world. For a customer, if they are already deep into the Spark ecosystem (using Python notebooks, etc.), Databricks might feel more natural. If they have a stack built around databases and SQL and need real-time reads/writes, SingleStore will integrate more naturally. Both can exist in a complement: e.g., an application might use SingleStore as its main database and periodically push large datasets to a data lake, where Databricks does heavy-duty ML and analysis.
Bottom line: SingleStore, Snowflake, and Databricks each target different primary needs – SingleStore targets fast translytical (HTAP) processing for applications, Snowflake targets simplified large-scale analytics for BI/warehouse workloads, and Databricks targets big data & AI pipelines on data lakes. SingleStore often highlights that it can replace multiple components (an OLTP DB, a warehouse, and even a cache/search system) with one unified DB singlestore.com. However, organizations may still choose to use it alongside Snowflake or Databricks in order to cover all use cases. For instance, SingleStore can act as a speed layer in front of Snowflake for operational analytics, or as a serving layer for machine learning models developed on Databricks. The competitive outlook is that SingleStore is carving a niche in real-time, operational analytics where neither Snowflake nor Databricks alone is ideal, while also encroaching on some warehouse workloads by offering SQL analytics with lower cost and complexity blocksandfiles.com.
Market Position and Outlook
Recent Product Innovations: In the last 1-2 years, SingleStore has aggressively expanded its product capabilities to stay ahead in the real-time data market. In 2023, it released version 8.x with features like fast synchronous replication, automatic cluster scaling, and universal storage improvements en.wikipedia.org. Notably, SingleStore added vector search indexing to tap into the AI boom, claiming up to 800-1000× faster vector similarity searches compared to other approaches dataversity.net. It also rolled out the SingleStore Kai API for MongoDB in mid-2023, which allows developers to use MongoDB queries and tools on SingleStore – effectively enabling JSON document store use cases with 100× faster analytics on JSON data than a typical NoSQL database infoworld.cominfoworld.com. These moves position SingleStore as a converged operational and analytical datastore that can even take on some NoSQL roles, appealing to a broader developer audience. Additionally, SingleStore introduced a no-code ingestion tool and deeper integration with Apache Iceberg in 2024 to unify with data lake ecosystems en.wikipedia.org. The product evolution shows SingleStore doubling down on its theme of “Single Store for all data types and workloads,” extending from transactions and analytics into full-text search, time-series, and AI-ready features in one platform.
Strategic Partnerships and Ecosystem: SingleStore’s collaboration with major tech players underscores its strategic direction. The partnership with IBM (announced in late 2021) not only brought investment but also integration – SingleStore is offered as part of IBM’s data fabric solutions and IBM Cloud Pak for Data blocksandfiles.comblocksandfiles.com. In 2023, IBM and SingleStore further partnered on the watsonx platform to support generative AI applications, highlighting SingleStore’s role in providing real-time data to AI workflows en.wikipedia.org. SingleStore also works closely with cloud providers: it has a partnership with Amazon AWS to bring SingleStore’s real-time analytics to AWS customers (and many reference architectures/case studies, as seen with Skai and Siemens, involve SingleStore on AWS) singlestore.com. It is available through the marketplaces of AWS, Azure, and GCP. Another key partnership is with SAS (the analytics software giant), which in 2020 entered a strategic relationship to use SingleStore as an engine to accelerate SAS Viya analytics for high concurrency scenarios singlestore.com. These alliances with IBM, SAS, and cloud providers indicate SingleStore is positioning itself as the embedded real-time database layer for larger analytics and AI platforms, rather than trying to build end-user analytics tools or ML tools itself.
Market Reception: SingleStore has gained industry recognition as a leader in the “translytical” database space, which is validated by analyst reports. It was featured in Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for Cloud Database Management Systems in 2021 and 2022 en.wikipedia.org. In 2024, SingleStore won multiple TrustRadius Top Rated awards in categories like relational databases, indicating strong customer satisfaction en.wikipedia.org. Furthermore, SingleStore was named a Leader in Bloor Research’s 2025 report on vector databases, reflecting how its new vector capabilities are seen as cutting-edge in serving AI use cases singlestore.com. Competing against both established data warehouses and newer cloud databases (like Google Spanner, Azure Cosmos DB, etc.), SingleStore’s differentiator of unifying workloads has been its selling point. Industry observers often mention SingleStore in the same breath as other HTAP databases like Oracle HeatWave (MySQL HeatWave) or PingCAP TiDB, but SingleStore has the advantage of maturity (over a decade of development) and a strong go-to-market via cloud offerings.
Financial and Growth Status: As a private company, SingleStore has been well-funded to pursue growth. After the $80M Series E in 2020 led by Insight Partners techcrunch.com, SingleStore raised a $116M Series F in July 2022 at a valuation exceeding $1.3B blocksandfiles.com. Investors in that round included Goldman Sachs, Dell Technologies Capital, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and IBM Ventures, underscoring confidence from both financial and strategic backers blocksandfiles.com. An extension to the Series F in late 2022 added another $30M (with participation from Prosperity7 and others), bringing total funding to around $464M to date forgeglobal.com. This capital has fueled an aggressive hiring and R&D expansion blocksandfiles.com. CEO Raj Verma indicated that SingleStore has been preparing for a potential IPO, though as of early 2025 it has not formally filed to go public blocksandfiles.com. The company’s revenue growth (crossing $100M ARR as noted) and customer traction put it in a good position, but like many tech firms, it likely awaits favorable market conditions for an IPO. In the meantime, SingleStore’s focus is on expanding its cloud service customer base and global reach. It has opened offices/hubs in Seattle, London, Lisbon, Bangalore, etc., to support its growing operations en.wikipedia.org.
Competitive Outlook: SingleStore competes in a dynamic market against both incumbents and startups. Its most direct competition on the HTAP database front includes Oracle (with its HeatWave in-memory query accelerator for MySQL) and hybrid databases like Amazon Aurora (especially Aurora Serverless v2 with analytics) or Google Cloud Spanner + BigQuery combined. Against cloud data warehouses like Snowflake, SingleStore pitches itself as a more cost-efficient, real-time alternative for operational analytics blocksandfiles.com. Against data lakehouse solutions like Databricks, SingleStore emphasizes simplicity (no complex Spark infrastructure needed for fast queries) and immediate consistency. One potential challenge is that giants like Snowflake and Databricks are themselves adding features to encroach on HTAP: Snowflake is adding more real-time streaming ingestion and even UDFs for small transactions, and Databricks is improving Photon (its SQL engine) for lower latency. SingleStore will need to continue innovating to maintain its performance edge. The recent moves into vectors and document store API show it is adapting to new trends (AI and developer flexibility) quickly.
From an executive and investor standpoint, SingleStore’s value proposition is clear: it can dramatically simplify data architecture and lower data infrastructure costs by replacing multiple systems with one singlestore.comblocksandfiles.com. Its story aligns with enterprises seeking real-time agility – “the future is real time,” as CEO Raj Verma puts it, requiring a “fast, unified, and highly reliable database” to power modern applications blocksandfiles.com. For technical teams, SingleStore offers familiar SQL tools but with modern performance, making it attractive to adopt without steep learning curves. And for investors, SingleStore sits at the intersection of several growing markets (operational databases, analytics, AI backends), giving it multiple paths to expand. As of 2025, SingleStore’s strategy is to reinforce its position as the leader in real-time databases – continuing to improve speed, scale, and developer experience – while leveraging strategic partnerships (with cloud vendors and AI platforms) to broaden its reach. If it executes well, SingleStore could emerge as a key engine powering the next generation of data-intensive applications that demand instant insights from big data.
Sources:
-
Forge Global, SingleStore (MemSQL) IPO Profile forgeglobal.comforgeglobal.com
-
The Brand Hopper, SingleStore – History, Founders, Business & Revenue Modelthebrandhopper.comthebrandhopper.com
-
Business Wire, MemSQL Changes Name to SingleStore (Oct 27, 2020) businesswire.com
-
Blocks & Files, SingleStore raises $116m, preps for potential IPO (July 13, 2022) blocksandfiles.comblocksandfiles.com
-
Insight Partners, Behind the Investment: SingleStore – One Platform for All Data insightpartners.cominsightpartners.com
-
SingleStore Blog, The TPC-DS Benchmarking Showdown – A SingleStore POV singlestore.comsinglestore.com
-
Wikipedia, SingleStore (retrieved 2025) en.wikipedia.orgen.wikipedia.org
-
InfoWorld, 6 key features of SingleStore Kai for MongoDB (Jun 2023) infoworld.cominfoworld.com
-
AWS Case Study, Skai and SingleStore on AWS (2023) aws.amazon.comaws.amazon.com
-
SingleStore Case Study, Real-Time Analytics at Uber singlestore.comsinglestore.com
-
Twingo (blog), Snowflake vs SingleStore Cost Comparison (2023) twingo.co.iltwingo.co.il
-
Blocks & Files, IBM invests in SingleStore (Nov 30, 2021) blocksandfiles.comblocksandfiles.com
-
Madrona Venture Group, Interview with Nikita Shamgunov (Apr 17, 2024) madrona.com
-
SingleStore “Made on SingleStore” Customer Stories singlestore.comsinglestore.com
-
Fathom Analytics Case, Why Fathom Ditched MySQL, Redis, DynamoDB for SingleStore singlestore.comsinglestore.com